AnalystScope

ABT

Abbott Laboratories

Abbott looks like a steadier diversified healthcare hold than a hard-rating opportunity, with the current valuation spread still moderate rather than wide.

Live company workspace

This page is the active working surface. It combines the latest price context, filing status, reported fundamentals, refreshed model-base statements, current valuation output, and the scenario workbench. The report page stays separate as the published archival report.

Latest note event: New
Current published rating: Hold
Open published report

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Apr 10, 2026.

Current model signal

Buy

Confidence: Low

Implied return: +15.2 upside

Fair value $102 vs. current $88 (+15.2 upside).

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Live investment view

Base case stance: Buy with low confidence as shares are currently being evaluated against an older daily scheduled quote of $88 versus $102 fair value, implying +15.2 upside. This workspace updates with the latest daily scheduled quote and reported inputs, while the published report remains a point-in-time note.

Price basis warning

Current price-dependent output is using a stale scheduled quote. Fair value, upside / downside, and the model signal are still shown, but they should be read with caution until a fresher daily scheduled quote refresh is available.

Current model signal

Buy

Latest note event

New

Published Apr 10, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Published Apr 10, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Daily scheduled refresh

Alpha Vantage GLOBAL_QUOTE

Latest daily scheduled quote is past the freshness window. Daily scheduled refresh as of May 21, 2026, 6:52 AM UTC. Fresh through May 22, 2026, 6:52 AM UTC.

Filing refreshed

SD filed May 27, 2026

Filing refreshed Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 PM UTC.

Open filing source

Fundamentals refreshed

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-12-31.

Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.

Current model signal

Buy

Confidence

Low

Stale scheduled quote

$88

Fair value

$102

Upside / Downside

+15.2 upside

Top drivers

A diversified healthcare portfolio reduces dependence on any one procedure or product cycle.

Reasonable margin durability and cash conversion support downside protection.

Top risks

Procedure, diagnostics, or product-cycle softness could keep results below the current through-cycle base.

The setup is diversified, but that also limits the odds of a sharp near-term rerating.

Sector / Industry

Health Care

Health Care Equipment & Supplies

Headquarters

Abbott Park, IL

Market Cap

$180B

Current / Fair Value

$88 / $102

Upside / Downside

+15.2 upside

Coverage snapshot

Report updated: Apr 10, 2026

Curated public preview analysis with live price, filing metadata, and reported fundamentals overlays. Full live filing ingestion is not yet enabled.

Coverage currently spans twenty-eight companies: MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, ORCL, AMD, NFLX, V, MA, WMT, PG, JNJ, ADBE, CSCO, TXN, COST, KO, HD, PEP, QCOM, INTU, MCD, ADP, ABT, and IBM.

Model-base financial summary

Current annual model-base range: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025

Revenue (Latest FY)

FY2025 | +5.5% vs prior FY

$44.3B

Operating Margin

+74 bps vs prior FY

16.9%

FCF (Latest FY)

14.4% margin | FY2025

$6.4B

Net Cash / (Debt)

Balance sheet remains manageable against diversified healthcare cash generation

($5.0B)

Key ratios

EV / NTM EBITDA

Sector 14.7x

15.0x

P / NTM EPS

Sector 18.1x

18.6x

ROIC

Sector 11.8%

15.2%

Rule of 40

Healthy

23%

Base-case assumptions

These are AnalystScope's current base-case valuation inputs. The note under each number explains why that level is considered reasonable for this company; the sensitivity line shows how much fair value moves if that judgment is wrong.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

5.0%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$4/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: A diversified healthcare portfolio reduces dependence on any one procedure or product cycle.

Terminal Growth

2.5%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 2.5%, it sits well below the 5.0% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Abbott Laboratories, that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

8.0%

+/- 0.5% => -$4/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Balance sheet remains manageable against diversified healthcare cash generation

Operating Margin (Year 5)

17.8%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (16.9%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input keeps the base on durable diversified-healthcare economics rather than temporary mix or supply-chain relief.

How to read the assumptions and sensitivities

These are base-case assumptions used to estimate fair value. They are reasonable model inputs, not reported facts.

Each sensitivity line shows the estimated fair-value-per-share change from a small move in that one input while the other inputs stay fixed.

bps means basis points. 100 bps equals 1.00 percentage point.

WACC sensitivity moves in the opposite direction because a higher discount rate lowers present value, while a lower discount rate raises it.

Scenario workbench

Analyst workbench

This is a private working layer, not the published AnalystScope base case or report view. It keeps the published base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates the fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for ABT. Base-case rationale remains in the assumptions section above. Scenario output now reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the published AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust the inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the published base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Published base case: 5.0% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$4/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 11.0%

Terminal Growth

Published base case: 2.5% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 1.0% to 4.0%

WACC

Published base case: 8.0% | +/- 0.5% => -$4/sh

Allowed range: 6.0% to 10.0%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Published base case: 17.8% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 9.8% to 25.8%

Private saved scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for ABT. They never overwrite the published AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$102

Upside / Downside

+15.2 upside

Model signal

Buy

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$102

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

+15.2 upside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Buy

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$93$93$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$110$110$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$108$108$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$102$102-$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

5.0%2.5%8.0%17.8%

$102

+15.2 upside

Buy

Published anchor

Model-base financial statements

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.

Income statement

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Revenue$40.1B$42.0B$44.3B
Gross Profit$22.1B$23.3B$24.7B
Operating Income$6.2B$6.8B$7.5B
EBITDA$8.2B$8.9B$9.8B
Net Income$4.8B$5.3B$5.8B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Cash & Investments$8.0B$8.5B$9.0B
Total Debt$15.0B$14.5B$14.0B
Net Cash / (Debt)($7.0B)($6.0B)($5.0B)
Total Assets$77.0B$80.0B$83.0B
Total Liabilities$33.0B$34.0B$35.0B
Shareholders' Equity$44.0B$46.0B$48.0B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$7.2B$7.7B$8.3B
Depreciation & Amortization$2.0B$2.1B$2.3B
Capital Expenditures($1.7B)($1.8B)($1.9B)
Free Cash Flow$5.5B$5.9B$6.4B

Model base vs reported fundamentals

Side-by-side view of the latest live reported fundamentals versus the current AnalystScope model base used in public valuation and thesis work.

Reported numbers show the latest company print. Model base is the comparable operating base AnalystScope uses for valuation work, which can include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported figures do not look durable.

Reported fundamentals source

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-12-31.

Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.

Model-base impact on the thesis

For Abbott, the model base is intended to reflect diversified healthcare economics through product-cycle and procedure noise rather than a single period's operating mix.

Model-base diagnostics

Latest model base FY2025 versus the current live reported snapshot where available.

Income statement

Revenue

FY2025 $44.3B vs reported TTM $44.3B (-0.1%)

Operating margin

FY2025 16.9% vs reported 18.2% (-1.2 pts)

Cash flow

Free cash flow

FY2025 $6.4B vs reported TTM $7.4B (-13.5%)

FCF margin

FY2025 14.4% vs reported 16.7% (-2.2 pts)

Balance sheet

Net cash / (debt)

FY2025 Net debt $5.0B vs reported Net debt $27.2B

MetricLive reportedStatusModel baseStatus
Revenue (TTM)$44.3BLive reported$44.3B

+5.5% YoY

Adjustment: Model revenue smooths device, diagnostics, and nutrition timing rather than extrapolating any one procedure or respiratory season.

Model base
Operating Margin18.2%Live reported16.9%

+74 bps YoY

Adjustment: Margin input keeps the base on durable diversified-healthcare economics rather than temporary mix or supply-chain relief.

Model base
FCF (TTM)$7.4BLive reported$6.4B

14.4% margin

Adjustment: FCF input adjusts for working-capital timing and keeps the cash-conversion base conservative.

Model base
Net Cash / (Debt)($27.2B)Live reported($5.0B)

Balance sheet remains manageable against diversified healthcare cash generation

Adjustment: Balance-sheet treatment remains measured and does not assume all cash is freely distributable.

Model base

Reported vs durable model base

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

For Abbott, the model base is intended to reflect diversified healthcare economics through product-cycle and procedure noise rather than a single period's operating mix.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

Net Cash / (Debt)

($5.0B)

FY2025 model base

($27.2B)

Live reported balance sheet

+$22.2B / +50% of revenueLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is less conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure because the latest reported balance does not appear fully representative. It remains measured and does not assume all cash is freely distributable.

FCF (TTM)

$6.4B

FY2025 model base

$7.4B

Live reported TTM

-$1.0B / -14%Moderate adjustmentModel base is lower than live reported because cash generation is being smoothed for timing effects rather than taken at face value. It adjusts for working-capital timing and keeps the cash-conversion base conservative.

Operating Margin

16.9%

FY2025 model base

18.2%

Live reported margin

-1.3 ptsClose to reportedModel base is lower than live reported because current margin strength is not being treated as a permanent through-cycle outcome. It keeps the base on durable diversified-healthcare economics rather than temporary mix or supply-chain relief.

Revenue (TTM)

$44.3B

FY2025 model base

$44.3B

Live reported TTM

+$0.0 / +0%Close to reportedModel base keeps revenue close to live reported because the latest run-rate already looks broadly representative. It smooths device, diagnostics, and nutrition timing rather than extrapolating any one procedure or respiratory season.

Financial diagnostics

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Adjustment focus

Large analyst adjustment

Balance sheet | Net Cash / (Debt) | +$22.2B / +50% of revenue

Revenue momentum

Stable

+5.5% latest 1Y growth

vs +4.7% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Stable

16.9% latest margin

+74 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Stable

14.4% latest FCF margin

+40 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Stable

Net debt 11.3% of revenue

vs Net debt 14.3% of revenue prior FY

Thesis scorecard

Qualitative scorecard of the main thesis dimensions behind the current investment view.

Growth

Moderate

Growth is diversified and durable, though not unusually fast.

Profitability

Moderate

Margins are solid, though not at the level of the best software or payment franchises.

Balance sheet

Moderate

Leverage is manageable against the cash-flow profile.

Valuation

Moderate

The current multiple is reasonable, but the spread to fair value is still contained.

Execution / Resilience

Strong

Diversification across devices, diagnostics, and nutrition supports resilience.

Key drivers

A diversified healthcare portfolio reduces dependence on any one procedure or product cycle.

Reasonable margin durability and cash conversion support downside protection.

The current valuation leaves some room for steady execution, but not enough to force a stronger rating.

Key risks

Procedure, diagnostics, or product-cycle softness could keep results below the current through-cycle base.

The setup is diversified, but that also limits the odds of a sharp near-term rerating.

If margin improvement stalls while the multiple holds, the upside case would stay constrained.

What would change our view

A wider discount to fair value would make the diversified-healthcare story more attractive.

Clearer evidence of durable device and diagnostics acceleration would improve conviction.

If growth softens while margins stay capped, the current Hold stance would be harder to defend.

Near-term catalysts

Device procedure commentary and diagnostics demand remain the clearest near-term signals.

Gross-margin mix and cash-conversion quality matter as much as any single revenue beat in this setup.

Any cleaner evidence of broad-based portfolio acceleration would improve the current valuation read-through.

What we are watching

Whether diversified portfolio growth remains balanced rather than dependent on one faster segment.

How durable current margin stability is as product mix shifts.

Whether free-cash-flow conversion remains strong enough to support the current fair-value range.

Coverage metadata

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Apr 10, 2026.

Report updated

Apr 10, 2026

Coverage status

Active coverage

Latest note event

New

Apr 10, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Apr 10, 2026

Analyst note

Watching portfolio breadth, margin durability, and whether diversified healthcare resilience is translating into stronger fair-value support.

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Coverage timeline

Timeline events show published note events and the rating that followed each event. The current model signal is shown separately above.

Apr 10, 2026

NewHold

Started coverage with a Hold view on diversified healthcare quality and a moderate spread to fair value.

Bull / Base / Bear scenarios

Bull case

$110

Normalized support: Growth, margin, and cash-flow trends are mixed versus the upside case.

Base case

$102

Normalized support: Current margin, cash-generation, and balance-sheet profile are mixed.

Bear case

$89

Downside protection: Cash generation and balance-sheet support are mixed in the bear case.

Why this rating

The stock is currently being evaluated against $88 versus a base-case fair value of $102, implying +15.2 upside. That supports a Buy rating with Low confidence under the current model.

Stale scheduled quote

$88

Fair value

$102

Upside / Downside

+15.2 upside

Model signal / Confidence

Buy / Low

Confidence framing

Method agreement / dispersion

Valuation methods show a wider range from $93 to $110, which tempers conviction.

Margin strength

Operating margin is 16.9%, with +74 bps vs prior FY.

Balance sheet position

Balance sheet positioning currently reflects net debt of ($5.0B), with balance sheet remains manageable against diversified healthcare cash generation.

Valuation methods

MethodImplied ValueWeight
DCF (Base)$9345%
NTM P/E Multiple$11035%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$10820%

Buy / Hold / Sell output

Current model recommendation

Buy

Price: $88

Fair value: $102

Implied upside / downside: +15.2 upside

Current published rating: Hold on Apr 10, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

The displayed rating is anchored to the base-case fair value. Buy is assigned at 8% or greater implied upside, Hold between -10% and +8%, and Sell at -10% or worse, with borderline calls cross-checked against normalized operating, cash-generation, and balance-sheet support. Confidence reflects valuation dispersion, operating margin profile, and balance-sheet strength.

What changed section

2026-04-10

Added to AnalystScope coverage

Impact: New Hold view on diversified healthcare durability

2026-04-10

Kept valuation framing disciplined

Impact: Avoids overstating upside from a still-contained spread to fair value