AnalystScope

ADP

Automatic Data Processing, Inc.

ADP remains a high-quality payroll and HCM compounder, but the current setup still looks closer to Hold than to a wide-gap rerating case.

Live company workspace

This page is the active working surface. It combines the latest price context, filing status, reported fundamentals, refreshed model-base statements, current valuation output, and the scenario workbench. The report page stays separate as the published archival report.

Latest note event: New
Current published rating: Hold
Open published report

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Apr 10, 2026.

Current model signal

Sell

Confidence: Medium

Implied return: -12.2 downside

Fair value $194 vs. current $221 (-12.2 downside).

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Live investment view

Base case stance: Sell with medium confidence as shares are currently being evaluated against an older daily scheduled quote of $221 versus $194 fair value, implying -12.2 downside. This workspace updates with the latest daily scheduled quote and reported inputs, while the published report remains a point-in-time note.

Price basis warning

Current price-dependent output is using a stale scheduled quote. Fair value, upside / downside, and the model signal are still shown, but they should be read with caution until a fresher daily scheduled quote refresh is available.

Current model signal

Sell

Latest note event

New

Published Apr 10, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Published Apr 10, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Daily scheduled refresh

Alpha Vantage GLOBAL_QUOTE

Latest daily scheduled quote is past the freshness window. Daily scheduled refresh as of May 21, 2026, 6:52 AM UTC. Fresh through May 22, 2026, 6:52 AM UTC.

Filing refreshed

4 filed May 11, 2026 | Reporting period May 7, 2026

Filing refreshed Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 PM UTC.

Open filing source

Fundamentals refreshed

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-06-30.

Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.

Current model signal

Sell

Confidence

Medium

Stale scheduled quote

$221

Fair value

$194

Upside / Downside

-12.2 downside

Top drivers

Payroll and HCM workflows remain mission-critical, supporting retention and durable recurring revenue.

Operating leverage and steady cash generation provide a credible valuation floor.

Top risks

A softer labor market could moderate client growth and payroll-linked revenue more than the base case assumes.

Client-funds and float dynamics make balance-sheet interpretation more nuanced than a simple net-cash read.

Sector / Industry

Industrials

Human Resource & Employment Services

Headquarters

Roseland, NJ

Market Cap

$77B

Current / Fair Value

$221 / $194

Upside / Downside

-12.2 downside

Coverage snapshot

Report updated: Apr 10, 2026

Curated public preview analysis with live price, filing metadata, and reported fundamentals overlays. Full live filing ingestion is not yet enabled.

Coverage currently spans twenty-eight companies: MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, ORCL, AMD, NFLX, V, MA, WMT, PG, JNJ, ADBE, CSCO, TXN, COST, KO, HD, PEP, QCOM, INTU, MCD, ADP, ABT, and IBM.

Model-base financial summary

Current annual model-base range: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025

Revenue (Latest FY)

FY2025 | +10.4% vs prior FY

$21.2B

Operating Margin

+104 bps vs prior FY

25.0%

FCF (Latest FY)

21.7% margin | FY2025

$4.6B

Net Cash / (Debt)

Balance-sheet treatment stays conservative around client-funds complexity

($800.0M)

Key ratios

EV / NTM EBITDA

Sector 14.2x

15.8x

P / NTM EPS

Sector 21.0x

19.5x

ROIC

Sector 13.2%

22.5%

Rule of 40

Strong

33%

Base-case assumptions

These are AnalystScope's current base-case valuation inputs. The note under each number explains why that level is considered reasonable for this company; the sensitivity line shows how much fair value moves if that judgment is wrong.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

6.0%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$5/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: Payroll and HCM workflows remain mission-critical, supporting retention and durable recurring revenue.

Terminal Growth

2.5%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 2.5%, it sits well below the 6.0% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Automatic Data Processing, Inc., that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

8.1%

+/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Balance-sheet treatment stays conservative around client-funds complexity

Operating Margin (Year 5)

25.5%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$4/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (25.0%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input keeps the base on durable software-and-services economics rather than temporary expense timing.

How to read the assumptions and sensitivities

These are base-case assumptions used to estimate fair value. They are reasonable model inputs, not reported facts.

Each sensitivity line shows the estimated fair-value-per-share change from a small move in that one input while the other inputs stay fixed.

bps means basis points. 100 bps equals 1.00 percentage point.

WACC sensitivity moves in the opposite direction because a higher discount rate lowers present value, while a lower discount rate raises it.

Scenario workbench

Analyst workbench

This is a private working layer, not the published AnalystScope base case or report view. It keeps the published base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates the fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for ADP. Base-case rationale remains in the assumptions section above. Scenario output now reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the published AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust the inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the published base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Published base case: 6.0% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$5/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 12.0%

Terminal Growth

Published base case: 2.5% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 1.0% to 4.0%

WACC

Published base case: 8.1% | +/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Allowed range: 6.1% to 10.1%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Published base case: 25.5% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$4/sh

Allowed range: 17.5% to 33.5%

Private saved scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for ADP. They never overwrite the published AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$194

Upside / Downside

-12.2 downside

Model signal

Sell

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$194

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

-12.2 downside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Sell

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$190$190$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$198$198$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$195$195$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$194$194-$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

6.0%2.5%8.1%25.5%

$194

-12.2 downside

Sell

Published anchor

Model-base financial statements

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.

Income statement

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Revenue$18.0B$19.2B$21.2B
Gross Profit$8.2B$8.9B$9.9B
Operating Income$4.0B$4.6B$5.3B
EBITDA$4.4B$5.1B$5.8B
Net Income$3.3B$3.7B$4.2B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Cash & Investments$2.6B$2.8B$3.0B
Total Debt$4.2B$4.0B$3.8B
Net Cash / (Debt)($1.6B)($1.2B)($800.0M)
Total Assets$52.0B$55.0B$58.0B
Total Liabilities$45.0B$47.6B$50.0B
Shareholders' Equity$7.0B$7.4B$8.0B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$4.1B$4.5B$5.0B
Depreciation & Amortization$400.0M$500.0M$500.0M
Capital Expenditures($300.0M)($300.0M)($400.0M)
Free Cash Flow$3.8B$4.2B$4.6B

Model base vs reported fundamentals

Side-by-side view of the latest live reported fundamentals versus the current AnalystScope model base used in public valuation and thesis work.

Reported numbers show the latest company print. Model base is the comparable operating base AnalystScope uses for valuation work, which can include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported figures do not look durable.

Reported fundamentals source

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-06-30.

Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.

Model-base impact on the thesis

For ADP, the model base is intended to capture durable payroll and HCM economics while being conservative around client-funds and timing noise.

Model-base diagnostics

Latest model base FY2025 versus the current live reported snapshot where available.

Income statement

Revenue

FY2025 $21.2B vs reported TTM $20.6B (+3.1%)

Balance sheet

Net cash / (debt)

FY2025 Net debt $800.0M vs reported Net debt $767.1M

MetricLive reportedStatusModel baseStatus
Revenue (TTM)$20.6BLive reported$21.2B

+10.4% YoY

Adjustment: Model revenue smooths client employment growth and implementation timing rather than extrapolating one payroll cycle or labor print.

Model base
Operating MarginUnavailableUnavailable25.0%

+104 bps YoY

Adjustment: Margin input keeps the base on durable software-and-services economics rather than temporary expense timing.

Model base
FCF (TTM)UnavailableUnavailable$4.6B

21.7% margin

Adjustment: FCF input adjusts for working-capital timing and avoids overstating cash generation from short-term float effects.

Model base
Net Cash / (Debt)($767.1M)Live reported($800.0M)

Balance-sheet treatment stays conservative around client-funds complexity

Adjustment: Balance-sheet treatment stays conservative around client funds and does not present that float as straightforward distributable net cash.

Model base

Reported vs durable model base

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

For ADP, the model base is intended to capture durable payroll and HCM economics while being conservative around client-funds and timing noise.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

Revenue (TTM)

$21.2B

FY2025 model base

$20.6B

Live reported TTM

+$600.0M / +3%Close to reportedModel base is higher than live reported because the thesis does not assume the latest reported softness is the durable revenue run-rate. It smooths client employment growth and implementation timing rather than extrapolating one payroll cycle or labor print.

Net Cash / (Debt)

($800.0M)

FY2025 model base

($767.1M)

Live reported balance sheet

-$32.9M / 0% of revenueClose to reportedModel base is more conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure. It stays conservative around client funds and does not present that float as straightforward distributable net cash.

Operating Margin

25.0%

FY2025 model base

Unavailable

Live reported margin

UnavailableUnavailableAnalystScope keeps a separate model base when the latest reported figure is unavailable or not directly comparable. It keeps the base on durable software-and-services economics rather than temporary expense timing.

FCF (TTM)

$4.6B

FY2025 model base

Unavailable

Live reported TTM

UnavailableUnavailableAnalystScope keeps a separate model base when the latest reported figure is unavailable or not directly comparable. It adjusts for working-capital timing and avoids overstating cash generation from short-term float effects.

Financial diagnostics

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Revenue momentum

Improving

+10.4% latest 1Y growth

vs +6.7% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Improving

25.0% latest margin

+104 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Stable

21.7% latest FCF margin

-18 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Stable

Net debt 3.8% of revenue

vs Net debt 6.3% of revenue prior FY

Thesis scorecard

Qualitative scorecard of the main thesis dimensions behind the current investment view.

Growth

Moderate

Recurring payroll and HCM demand supports steady growth, though not a high-velocity profile.

Profitability

Strong

Scale and retention support durable operating leverage.

Balance sheet

Moderate

The balance sheet is manageable, but client-funds complexity warrants conservative treatment.

Valuation

Moderate

The recent drawdown helps, but the valuation spread still looks contained.

Execution / Resilience

Strong

Payroll mission-criticality and retention support resilience.

Key drivers

Payroll and HCM workflows remain mission-critical, supporting retention and durable recurring revenue.

Operating leverage and steady cash generation provide a credible valuation floor.

The current multiple is more reasonable than prior highs, but still not cheap enough to force a harder rating.

Key risks

A softer labor market could moderate client growth and payroll-linked revenue more than the base case assumes.

Client-funds and float dynamics make balance-sheet interpretation more nuanced than a simple net-cash read.

If margin progression slows while the multiple stays firm, the upside case would narrow.

What would change our view

A wider discount to fair value would make the workflow-quality story more attractive.

Stronger evidence of durable HCM cross-sell and client growth would improve conviction.

If labor-market softness persists and cash conversion weakens, the current Hold stance would deteriorate.

Near-term catalysts

Client-retention, pays-per-control, and HCM attach commentary remain the clearest near-term drivers.

Margin flow-through matters more than a single quarter of payroll-volume noise in this setup.

Any clearer read on labor-market resilience would help frame the current revenue base.

What we are watching

Whether client growth and retention stay solid through a softer labor backdrop.

How much current cash conversion is structural versus influenced by float and timing effects.

Whether HCM mix is strengthening enough to offset any slower payroll-volume growth.

Coverage metadata

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Apr 10, 2026.

Report updated

Apr 10, 2026

Coverage status

Active coverage

Latest note event

New

Apr 10, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Apr 10, 2026

Analyst note

Watching labor-market sensitivity, client retention, and whether cash conversion remains durable after float-related normalization.

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Coverage timeline

Timeline events show published note events and the rating that followed each event. The current model signal is shown separately above.

Apr 10, 2026

NewHold

Started coverage with a Hold view on recurring payroll economics and a still-contained spread to fair value.

Bull / Base / Bear scenarios

Bull case

$207

Normalized support: Growth, margin, and cash-flow trends are supportive of the upside case.

Base case

$194

Normalized support: Current margin, cash-generation, and balance-sheet profile support the base case.

Bear case

$177

Downside protection: Cash generation and balance-sheet support are mixed in the bear case.

Why this rating

The stock is currently being evaluated against $221 versus a base-case fair value of $194, implying -12.2 downside. That supports a Sell rating with Medium confidence under the current model.

Stale scheduled quote

$221

Fair value

$194

Upside / Downside

-12.2 downside

Model signal / Confidence

Sell / Medium

Confidence framing

Method agreement / dispersion

Valuation methods are tightly grouped, with implied values ranging from $190 to $198.

Margin strength

Operating margin is 25.0%, with +104 bps vs prior FY.

Balance sheet position

Balance sheet positioning currently reflects net debt of ($800.0M), with balance-sheet treatment stays conservative around client-funds complexity.

Valuation methods

MethodImplied ValueWeight
DCF (Base)$19045%
NTM P/E Multiple$19835%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$19520%

Buy / Hold / Sell output

Current model recommendation

Sell

Price: $221

Fair value: $194

Implied upside / downside: -12.2 downside

Current published rating: Hold on Apr 10, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

The displayed rating is anchored to the base-case fair value. Buy is assigned at 8% or greater implied upside, Hold between -10% and +8%, and Sell at -10% or worse, with borderline calls cross-checked against normalized operating, cash-generation, and balance-sheet support. Confidence reflects valuation dispersion, operating margin profile, and balance-sheet strength.

What changed section

2026-04-10

Added to AnalystScope coverage

Impact: New Hold view on durable payroll-and-HCM economics

2026-04-10

Kept balance-sheet treatment conservative

Impact: Avoids overstating support from client-funds-related cash balances