AnalystScope

DHR

Danaher Corporation (DHR)

Danaher Corporation is added as a high-quality large-cap coverage candidate with life sciences and diagnostics tools portfolio with process-driven operating discipline. The initial AnalystScope view weighs bioprocessing recovery, diagnostics durability, and portfolio execution against quality multiple requires clearer bioprocessing recovery evidence, keeping the rating restrained until the model has more live refresh history.

Main company research view

Start here for AnalystScope's current fair value, model signal, thesis drivers, assumptions, normalized fundamentals, and private scenario sandbox. The printable report is secondary: a point-in-time published snapshot for archive or print use, not the primary research destination.

Latest note event: New
Current published rating: Hold
View printable snapshotCompare valuationMethodology

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Jun 13, 2026.

Current model signal

Buy

Confidence: Medium

Implied return: +48.8 upside

Fair value $268 vs. current $180 (+48.8 upside).

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Price vs fair value

+48.8%

Model-implied return

Stale scheduled quote

$180

Fair value

$268

Valuation method stack

Weighted fair value $268

Published method weights

DCF (Base)

$274 | 45%

NTM P/E Multiple

$265 | 35%

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

$260 | 20%

Current research conclusion

Base case stance: Buy with medium confidence as shares are currently being evaluated against an older daily scheduled quote of $180 versus $268 fair value, implying +48.8 upside. This workspace updates with the latest daily scheduled quote and reported inputs, while the printable report remains a point-in-time published snapshot.

Price basis warning

Current price-dependent output is using a stale scheduled quote. Fair value, upside / downside, and the model signal are still shown, but they should be read with caution until a fresher daily scheduled quote refresh is available.

Current model signal

Buy

Latest note event

New

Published Jun 13, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Published Jun 13, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Daily scheduled refresh

Alpha Vantage GLOBAL_QUOTE

Latest daily scheduled quote is past the freshness window. Daily scheduled refresh as of Jun 15, 2026, 11:48 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 16, 2026, 11:48 AM UTC.

Filing refreshed

11-K filed Jun 16, 2026 | Reporting period Dec 31, 2025

Filing refreshed Jun 17, 2026, 3:56 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 17, 2026, 3:56 PM UTC.

Open filing source

Fundamentals refreshed

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-12-31.

Fundamentals refreshed 17 Jun 2026, 04:01 UTC. Fresh through 17 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC.

Current model signal

Buy

Confidence

Medium

Stale scheduled quote

$180

Fair value

$268

Upside / Downside

+48.8 upside

Top drivers

Bioprocessing recovery can support growth.

Operating discipline improves margin resilience.

Top risks

Bioprocessing demand may recover slower than expected.

Acquisition execution and leverage can affect returns.

Sector / Industry

Health Care

Life Sciences Tools & Services

Headquarters

Washington, DC

Market Cap

$188B

Current / Fair Value

$180 / $268

Upside / Downside

+48.8 upside

Coverage snapshot

Report updated: Jun 15, 2026

Curated public preview analysis with live price, filing metadata, and reported fundamentals overlays. Full live filing ingestion is not yet enabled.

Coverage currently spans sixty-five companies: MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, ORCL, AMD, NFLX, V, MA, WMT, PG, JNJ, ADBE, CSCO, TXN, COST, KO, HD, PEP, QCOM, INTU, MCD, ADP, ABT, IBM, LOW, SBUX, NKE, DIS, AMAT, LRCX, MRK, PFE, TMO, ACN, NOW, PANW, SNPS, CDNS, ADI, HON, CAT, DE, UPS, BKNG, YUM, MDLZ, FDX, CMG, TGT, LULU, GILD, AMGN, REGN, ZTS, ISRG, SYK, DHR, CL, KMB, ROST, and TJX.

Fundamental snapshot

FY2025

Normalized annual model base

Revenue

+5.3% YoY

$25.8B

Op. margin

+0.7% pts

25.2%

FCF margin

+1.1% pts

25.6%

Revenue + margin trend

Annual normalized model-base history.

Revenue

2023
2024
2025

Operating margin

2023
2024
2025

Model-base financial summary

Current annual model-base range: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025

Revenue (Latest FY)

FY2025 | +5.3% vs prior FY

$25.8B

Operating Margin

+70 bps vs prior FY

25.2%

FCF (Latest FY)

25.6% margin | FY2025

$6.6B

Net Cash / (Debt)

Debt is manageable but demand recovery remains important

($14.0B)

Key ratios

EV / NTM EBITDA

Life sciences tools peer set

25.0x

P / NTM EPS

Life sciences tools peer set

32.0x

ROIC

Quality large-cap peer set

10.5%

Rule of 40

Business-model context

31%

Base-case assumptions

These are AnalystScope's current base-case valuation inputs. The note under each number explains why that level is considered reasonable for this company; the sensitivity line shows how much fair value moves if that judgment is wrong.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

5.0%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$7/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: Bioprocessing recovery can support growth.

Terminal Growth

2.5%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$6/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 2.5%, it sits well below the 5.0% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Danaher Corporation, that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

8.1%

+/- 0.5% => -$10/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Debt is manageable but demand recovery remains important

Operating Margin (Year 5)

26.0%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$6/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (25.2%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.

How to read the assumptions and sensitivities

These are base-case assumptions used to estimate fair value. They are reasonable model inputs, not reported facts.

Each sensitivity line shows the estimated fair-value-per-share change from a small move in that one input while the other inputs stay fixed.

bps means basis points. 100 bps equals 1.00 percentage point.

WACC sensitivity moves in the opposite direction because a higher discount rate lowers present value, while a lower discount rate raises it.

Scenario workbench

Private scenario sandbox

This is a private modelling layer, not the public AnalystScope base case or printable snapshot. It keeps the public base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates your scenario fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for DHR. Base-case rationale remains in the public assumptions section above. Your scenario output reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust your scenario inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the public AnalystScope base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Public AnalystScope base case: 5.0% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$7/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 11.0%

Terminal Growth

Public AnalystScope base case: 2.5% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$6/sh

Allowed range: 1.0% to 4.0%

WACC

Public AnalystScope base case: 8.1% | +/- 0.5% => -$10/sh

Allowed range: 6.1% to 10.1%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Public AnalystScope base case: 26.0% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$6/sh

Allowed range: 18.0% to 34.0%

Saved private scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for DHR. These are your scenarios: they never overwrite the public AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$268

Upside / Downside

+48.8 upside

Model signal

Buy

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$268

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

+48.8 upside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Buy

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$274$274$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$265$265$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$260$260$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$268$268+$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

5.0%2.5%8.1%26.0%

$268

+48.8 upside

Buy

Published anchor

Model-base financial statements

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.

Income statement

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Revenue$23.9B$24.5B$25.8B
Gross Profit$14.1B$14.6B$15.5B
Operating Income$5.7B$6.0B$6.5B
EBITDA$7.3B$7.6B$8.2B
Net Income$4.3B$4.5B$4.9B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Cash & Investments$6.5B$7.0B$7.5B
Total Debt$21.0B$21.2B$21.5B
Net Cash / (Debt)($14.5B)($14.2B)($14.0B)
Total Assets$84.0B$86.0B$88.0B
Total Liabilities$37.0B$37.0B$37.0B
Shareholders' Equity$47.0B$49.0B$51.0B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$6.5B$6.9B$7.5B
Depreciation & Amortization$1.6B$1.6B$1.7B
Capital Expenditures($800.0M)($900.0M)($900.0M)
Free Cash Flow$5.7B$6.0B$6.6B

Model base vs reported fundamentals

Side-by-side view of the latest live reported fundamentals versus the current AnalystScope model base used in public valuation and thesis work.

Reported numbers show the latest company print. Model base is the comparable operating base AnalystScope uses for valuation work, which can include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported figures do not look durable.

Reported fundamentals source

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-12-31.

Fundamentals refreshed 17 Jun 2026, 04:01 UTC. Fresh through 17 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC.

Model-base impact on the thesis

This initial coverage setup keeps valuation tied to durable normalized fundamentals and avoids letting a single recent print dominate the public view.

Model-base diagnostics

Latest model base FY2025 versus the current live reported snapshot where available.

Income statement

Revenue

FY2025 $25.8B vs reported TTM $24.6B (+5.0%)

Operating margin

FY2025 25.2% vs reported 19.1% (+6.1 pts)

Cash flow

Free cash flow

FY2025 $6.6B vs reported TTM $5.3B (+25.5%)

FCF margin

FY2025 25.6% vs reported 21.4% (+4.2 pts)

Balance sheet

Net cash / (debt)

FY2025 Net debt $14.0B vs reported Net debt $11.9B

MetricLive reportedStatusModel baseStatus
Revenue (TTM)$24.6BLive reported$25.8B

+5.3% YoY

Adjustment: Model revenue smooths short-term demand, timing, and segment-mix volatility rather than treating the latest period as a straight-line run rate.

Model base
Operating Margin19.1%Live reported25.2%

+70 bps YoY

Adjustment: Margin input uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.

Model base
FCF (TTM)$5.3BLive reported$6.6B

25.6% margin

Adjustment: FCF input normalizes working-capital and capital-spending timing so cash conversion is not over-read from one period.

Model base
Net Cash / (Debt)($11.9B)Live reported($14.0B)

Debt is manageable but demand recovery remains important

Adjustment: Balance-sheet input uses a conservative net cash / debt posture without assuming all cash is excess or fully distributable.

Model base

Reported vs durable model base

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

This initial coverage setup keeps valuation tied to durable normalized fundamentals and avoids letting a single recent print dominate the public view.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

FCF (TTM)

$6.6B

FY2025 model base

$5.3B

Live reported TTM

+$1.3B / +25%Large analyst adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest cash-flow drag is fully durable. It normalizes working-capital and capital-spending timing so cash conversion is not over-read from one period.

Net Cash / (Debt)

($14.0B)

FY2025 model base

($11.9B)

Live reported balance sheet

-$2.1B / -9% of revenueModerate adjustmentModel base is more conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure. It balance-sheet input uses a conservative net cash / debt posture without assuming all cash is excess or fully distributable.

Operating Margin

25.2%

FY2025 model base

19.1%

Live reported margin

+6.1 ptsLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest reported margin pressure is the durable earnings base. It uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.

Revenue (TTM)

$25.8B

FY2025 model base

$24.6B

Live reported TTM

+$1.2B / +5%Close to reportedModel base is higher than live reported because the thesis does not assume the latest reported softness is the durable revenue run-rate. It smooths short-term demand, timing, and segment-mix volatility rather than treating the latest period as a straight-line run rate.

Financial diagnostics

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Adjustment focus

Large analyst adjustment

Cash flow | FCF (TTM) | +$1.3B / +25%

Revenue momentum

Stable

+5.3% latest 1Y growth

vs +2.5% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Stable

25.2% latest margin

+70 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Improving

25.6% latest FCF margin

+109 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Strengthening

Net debt 54.3% of revenue

vs Net debt 58.0% of revenue prior FY

Thesis scorecard

Qualitative scorecard of the main thesis dimensions behind the current investment view.

Growth

Moderate

bioprocessing recovery, diagnostics durability, and portfolio execution

Profitability

Strong

Danaher operating discipline supports strong margins and cash conversion

Balance sheet

Moderate

debt is manageable but acquisition strategy keeps leverage relevant

Valuation

Moderate

quality multiple requires clearer bioprocessing recovery evidence

Execution / Resilience

Moderate

end-market recovery timing and portfolio execution are the main risks

Key drivers

Bioprocessing recovery can support growth.

Operating discipline improves margin resilience.

Portfolio quality supports cash conversion.

Key risks

Bioprocessing demand may recover slower than expected.

Acquisition execution and leverage can affect returns.

Diagnostics normalization can pressure growth.

What would change our view

A clearer evidence base around bioprocessing recovery, diagnostics durability, and portfolio execution would improve confidence.

A deterioration in danaher operating discipline supports strong margins and cash conversion would reduce support for the current fair value.

A wider gap between price and normalized cash-flow support would make the rating harder to defend.

Near-term catalysts

Next quarterly update and management commentary on demand quality.

Reported margin, cash-flow conversion, and balance-sheet movement versus the normalized model base.

Daily scheduled quote refreshes that tighten the current price-versus-fair-value read.

What we are watching

Bioprocessing order trends.

Core margin progression.

Cash conversion and acquisition discipline.

Coverage metadata

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Jun 13, 2026.

Report updated

Jun 13, 2026

Coverage status

Active coverage

Latest note event

New

Jun 13, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Jun 13, 2026

Analyst note

New coverage entry focused on bioprocessing recovery, diagnostics durability, and portfolio execution and quality multiple requires clearer bioprocessing recovery evidence.

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Coverage timeline

Timeline events show published note events and the rating that followed each event. The current model signal is shown separately above.

Jun 13, 2026

NewHold

Started coverage with a Hold view on quality tools exposure versus recovery timing.

Bull / Base / Bear scenarios

Bull case

$304

Normalized support: Growth, margin, and cash-flow trends are mixed versus the upside case.

Base case

$268

Normalized support: Current margin, cash-generation, and balance-sheet profile are mixed.

Bear case

$205

Downside protection: Cash generation and balance-sheet support are mixed in the bear case.

Why this rating

The stock is currently being evaluated against $180 versus a base-case fair value of $268, implying +48.8 upside. That supports a Buy rating with Medium confidence under the current model.

Stale scheduled quote

$180

Fair value

$268

Upside / Downside

+48.8 upside

Model signal / Confidence

Buy / Medium

Confidence framing

Method agreement / dispersion

Valuation methods are tightly grouped, with implied values ranging from $260 to $274.

Margin strength

Operating margin is 25.2%, with +70 bps vs prior FY.

Balance sheet position

Balance sheet positioning currently reflects net debt of ($14.0B), with debt is manageable but demand recovery remains important.

Valuation methods

MethodImplied ValueWeight
DCF (Base)$27445%
NTM P/E Multiple$26535%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$26020%

Buy / Hold / Sell output

Current model recommendation

Buy

Price: $180

Fair value: $268

Implied upside / downside: +48.8 upside

Current published rating: Hold on Jun 13, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

The displayed rating is anchored to the base-case fair value. Buy is assigned at 8% or greater implied upside, Hold between -10% and +8%, and Sell at -10% or worse, with borderline calls cross-checked against normalized operating, cash-generation, and balance-sheet support. Confidence reflects valuation dispersion, operating margin profile, and balance-sheet strength.

What changed section

2026-06-13

Added to AnalystScope coverage

Impact: Started coverage with a Hold view on quality tools exposure versus recovery timing.

2026-06-13

Initialized normalized annual model base

Impact: Adds a life-sciences tools peer while keeping demand-recovery risk explicit.