META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Meta continues to pair durable ad monetization with improving Reels and messaging economics, while AI investment and Reality Labs spend remain the main offsets.
Live company workspace
This page is the active working surface. It combines the latest price context, filing status, reported fundamentals, refreshed model-base statements, current valuation output, and the scenario workbench. The report page stays separate as the published archival report.
How to read note event vs rating
Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.
Both were published Mar 20, 2026.
Current model signal
Hold
Confidence: Medium
Implied return: -1.6 downside
Fair value $618 vs. current $628 (-1.6 downside).
Model vs published view
Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.
Live investment view
Base case stance: Hold with medium confidence as shares are currently being evaluated against an older daily scheduled quote of $628 versus $618 fair value, implying -1.6 downside. This workspace updates with the latest daily scheduled quote and reported inputs, while the published report remains a point-in-time note.
Price basis warning
Current price-dependent output is using a stale scheduled quote. Fair value, upside / downside, and the model signal are still shown, but they should be read with caution until a fresher daily scheduled quote refresh is available.
Current model signal
Hold
Latest note event
Upgraded
Published Mar 20, 2026
Current published rating
Buy
Published Mar 20, 2026
Model vs published view
Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.
Daily scheduled refresh
Alpha Vantage GLOBAL_QUOTE
Latest daily scheduled quote is past the freshness window. Daily scheduled refresh as of Apr 10, 2026, 6:26 PM UTC. Fresh through Apr 11, 2026, 6:26 PM UTC.
Filing refreshed
4 filed Jun 3, 2026 | Reporting period Jun 1, 2026
Filing refreshed Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 PM UTC.
Open filing sourceFundamentals refreshed
SEC XBRL companyfacts API
Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-12-31.
Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.
Current model signal
Hold
Confidence
Medium
Stale scheduled quote
$628
Fair value
$618
Upside / Downside
-1.6 downside
Top drivers
Ad monetization remains supported by improving recommendation systems and Reels engagement.
Messaging and broader AI tools continue to expand monetization opportunities beyond the core feed.
Top risks
AI and Reality Labs spending could stay elevated for longer than monetization supports.
Digital advertising demand remains sensitive to macro and regulatory shocks.
Sector / Industry
Communication Services
Internet Content & Information
Headquarters
Menlo Park, CA
Market Cap
$1.5T
Current / Fair Value
$628 / $618
Upside / Downside
-1.6 downside
Coverage snapshot
Report updated: Apr 10, 2026
Curated public preview analysis with live price, filing metadata, and reported fundamentals overlays. Full live filing ingestion is not yet enabled.
Coverage currently spans twenty-eight companies: MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, ORCL, AMD, NFLX, V, MA, WMT, PG, JNJ, ADBE, CSCO, TXN, COST, KO, HD, PEP, QCOM, INTU, MCD, ADP, ABT, and IBM.
Model-base financial summary
Current annual model-base range: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025
Revenue (Latest FY)
FY2025 | +18.0% vs prior FY
$170.2B
Operating Margin
+420 bps vs prior FY
41.7%
FCF (Latest FY)
36.1% margin | FY2025
$61.5B
Net Cash / (Debt)
Net cash positive
$41.8B
Key ratios
EV / NTM EBITDA
Sector 13.7x
18.2x
P / NTM EPS
Sector 21.5x
24.6x
ROIC
Sector 12.8%
29.4%
Rule of 40
Strong
59%
Base-case assumptions
These are AnalystScope's current base-case valuation inputs. The note under each number explains why that level is considered reasonable for this company; the sensitivity line shows how much fair value moves if that judgment is wrong.
Revenue CAGR (5Y)
12.0%
±1.0% => ±$18/sh
Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: Ad monetization remains supported by improving recommendation systems and Reels engagement.
Terminal Growth
3.0%
±0.5% => ±$14/sh
Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 3.0%, it sits well below the 12.0% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Meta Platforms, Inc., that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.
WACC
8.8%
±0.5% => ∓$19/sh
Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Net cash positive
Operating Margin (Year 5)
42.0%
±100 bps => ±$10/sh
Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (41.7%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input normalizes Reality Labs investment intensity and quarter-specific AI infrastructure costs.
How to read the assumptions and sensitivities
These are base-case assumptions used to estimate fair value. They are reasonable model inputs, not reported facts.
Each sensitivity line shows the estimated fair-value-per-share change from a small move in that one input while the other inputs stay fixed.
bps means basis points. 100 bps equals 1.00 percentage point.
WACC sensitivity moves in the opposite direction because a higher discount rate lowers present value, while a lower discount rate raises it.
Scenario workbench
Analyst workbench
This is a private working layer, not the published AnalystScope base case or report view. It keeps the published base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates the fair-value estimate immediately.
Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for META. Base-case rationale remains in the assumptions section above. Scenario output now reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the published AnalystScope framework.
Editable assumptions
Adjust the inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the published base case.
This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.
Matches the published AnalystScope base case.
Revenue CAGR (5Y)
Published base case: 12.0% | ±1.0% => ±$18/sh
Allowed range: 6.0% to 18.0%
Terminal Growth
Published base case: 3.0% | ±0.5% => ±$14/sh
Allowed range: 1.5% to 4.5%
WACC
Published base case: 8.8% | ±0.5% => ∓$19/sh
Allowed range: 6.8% to 10.8%
Operating Margin (Year 5)
Published base case: 42.0% | ±100 bps => ±$10/sh
Allowed range: 34.0% to 50.0%
Private saved scenarios
Save up to 5 named scenarios for META. They never overwrite the published AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.
Checking private workspace session...
Private scenario note
Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.
0 / 280
Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.
No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.
Published base case
Fair value
$618
Upside / Downside
-1.6 downside
Model signal
Hold
Published base-case output
Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.
Fair value
$618
$0/sh vs published base case
Upside / Downside
-1.6 downside
+0.0 pts vs published base case
Model signal
Hold
Unchanged versus the published base case.
Method movement inside the scenario
This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.
Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.
Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.
| Method | Published base | Edited scenario | Delta | How it moved / main drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DCF (Base) DCF-style | 50% weight | $631 | $631 | $0/sh | Base-aligned This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case. Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case. |
NTM P/E Multiple P/E-style | 30% weight | $615 | $615 | $0/sh | Base-aligned This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case. Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case. |
EV/EBITDA Cross-check EV-based multiple | 20% weight | $590 | $590 | $0/sh | Base-aligned This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case. Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case. |
Weighted fair value Published framework result | Published framework result | $618 | $618 | $0/sh | Base-aligned Combines the published method framework using the current inputs, which still align with the base-case result. Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case. |
Published base case vs private scenarios
Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.
Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.
Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.
| Scenario | Revenue CAGR (5Y) | Terminal Growth | WACC | Op. Margin (Y5) | Fair Value | Upside / Downside | Model Signal | Delta vs Base | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AnalystScope base case PublishedOfficial AnalystScope anchor row. | 12.0% | 3.0% | 8.8% | 42.0% | $618 | -1.6 downside | Hold | Published anchor |
Model-base financial statements
AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.
Income statement
| Line item | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $124.8B | $144.2B | $170.2B |
| Gross Profit | $100.1B | $116.9B | $138.9B |
| Operating Income | $40.1B | $54.1B | $71.0B |
| EBITDA | $46.3B | $61.5B | $79.9B |
| Net Income | $34.9B | $45.4B | $58.2B |
Balance sheet
| Line item | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Investments | $61.4B | $67.2B | $70.0B |
| Total Debt | $28.9B | $28.4B | $28.2B |
| Net Cash / (Debt) | $32.5B | $38.8B | $41.8B |
| Total Assets | $229.0B | $251.0B | $276.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $74.8B | $81.5B | $91.0B |
| Shareholders' Equity | $154.2B | $169.5B | $185.0B |
Cash flow
| Line item | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $48.4B | $58.1B | $70.5B |
| Depreciation & Amortization | $6.2B | $7.4B | $8.9B |
| Capital Expenditures | ($6.7B) | ($7.1B) | ($9.0B) |
| Free Cash Flow | $41.7B | $51.0B | $61.5B |
Model base vs reported fundamentals
Side-by-side view of the latest live reported fundamentals versus the current AnalystScope model base used in public valuation and thesis work.
Reported numbers show the latest company print. Model base is the comparable operating base AnalystScope uses for valuation work, which can include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported figures do not look durable.
Reported fundamentals source
SEC XBRL companyfacts API
Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-12-31.
Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.
Model-base impact on the thesis
For Meta, normalization reduces advertising-cycle and investment noise, which keeps the thesis anchored to durable cash generation rather than quarter-to-quarter margin swings.
Model-base diagnostics
Latest model base FY2025 versus the current live reported snapshot where available.
Income statement
Revenue
FY2025 $170.2B vs reported TTM $201.0B (-15.3%)
Operating margin
FY2025 41.7% vs reported 41.4% (+0.3 pts)
Cash flow
Free cash flow
FY2025 $61.5B vs reported TTM $46.1B (+33.4%)
FCF margin
FY2025 36.1% vs reported 22.9% (+13.2 pts)
Balance sheet
Net cash / (debt)
FY2025 Net cash $41.8B vs reported Net debt $35.3B
| Metric | Live reported | Status | Model base | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | $201.0B | Live reported | $170.2B +18.0% YoY Adjustment: Model revenue smooths advertising seasonality and changes in ad load measurement. | Model base |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | Live reported | 41.7% +420 bps YoY Adjustment: Margin input normalizes Reality Labs investment intensity and quarter-specific AI infrastructure costs. | Model base |
| FCF (TTM) | $46.1B | Live reported | $61.5B 36.1% margin Adjustment: FCF input cleans up capex timing and working-capital noise around infrastructure scaling. | Model base |
| Net Cash / (Debt) | ($35.3B) | Live reported | $41.8B Net cash positive Adjustment: Balance-sheet treatment keeps a conservative net-cash view after reserves and lease obligations. | Model base |
Reported vs durable model base
How to read this
Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.
This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.
Why the model base differs
For Meta, normalization reduces advertising-cycle and investment noise, which keeps the thesis anchored to durable cash generation rather than quarter-to-quarter margin swings.
Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.
| Metric | Model base | Live reported | Variance vs reported | Adjustment size | Why lower / higher? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Cash / (Debt) | $41.8B FY2025 model base | ($35.3B) Live reported balance sheet | +$77.1B / +38% of revenue | Large analyst adjustment | Model base is less conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure because the latest reported balance does not appear fully representative. It keeps a conservative net-cash view after reserves and lease obligations. |
FCF (TTM) | $61.5B FY2025 model base | $46.1B Live reported TTM | +$15.4B / +33% | Large analyst adjustment | Model base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest cash-flow drag is fully durable. It cleans up capex timing and working-capital noise around infrastructure scaling. |
Revenue (TTM) | $170.2B FY2025 model base | $201.0B Live reported TTM | -$30.8B / -15% | Moderate adjustment | Model base is lower than live reported because the thesis does not carry the current revenue run-rate straight into the durable operating base. It smooths advertising seasonality and changes in ad load measurement. |
Operating Margin | 41.7% FY2025 model base | 41.4% Live reported margin | +0.3 pts | Close to reported | Model base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest reported margin pressure is the durable earnings base. It normalizes Reality Labs investment intensity and quarter-specific AI infrastructure costs. |
Ratios + trends
Annual model-base income-statement, cash-flow, and balance-sheet metrics, plus cross-statement quality relationships with compact prior-FY direction cues, derived from the curated statement backbone.
Basis: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025. Live reported fundamentals remain available in the reconciliation section.
Operating and cash-flow trends
Revenue growth (1Y)
+18.0%
Gross margin
81.6%
Operating margin
41.7%
Operating margin change vs prior FY
+4.2 pts
EBITDA margin
46.9%
EBITDA margin change vs prior FY
+4.3 pts
Operating income growth (1Y)
+31.2%
Net margin
34.2%
FCF margin
36.1%
FCF margin change vs prior FY
+0.8 pts
FCF growth (1Y)
+20.6%
Balance sheet quality
Cash & investments
$70.0B
Total debt
$28.2B
Net cash / (debt)
Net cash $41.8B
Net cash / (debt) as % of revenue
Net cash 24.6% of revenue
Liabilities / assets
vs FY2024 (+0.5 pts)
33.0%
Cross-statement quality
Gross-to-operating spread
39.9 pts
Operating cash flow / net income
vs FY2024 (-0.1x)
1.2x
Operating cash flow / EBITDA
vs FY2024 (-0.1x)
0.9x
Free cash flow / net income
vs FY2024 (-0.1x)
1.1x
CapEx as % of revenue
vs FY2024 (+0.4 pts)
5.3%
CapEx as % of operating cash flow
vs FY2024 (+0.5 pts)
12.8%
CapEx / D&A
vs FY2024 (+0.1x)
1.0x
Cash & investments / total debt
vs FY2024 (+0.1x)
2.5x
Shareholders' equity as % of revenue
108.7%
Asset turnover
vs FY2024 (+0.0x)
0.6x
Financial diagnostics
Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.
Adjustment focus
Large analyst adjustmentBalance sheet | Net Cash / (Debt) | +$77.1B / +38% of revenue
Revenue momentum
Stable+18.0% latest 1Y growth
vs +15.5% prior 1Y
Operating margin trend
Improving41.7% latest margin
+420 bps vs prior FY
FCF margin trend
Stable36.1% latest FCF margin
+77 bps vs prior FY
Balance-sheet posture
StableNet cash 24.6% of revenue
vs Net cash 26.9% of revenue prior FY
Thesis scorecard
Qualitative scorecard of the main thesis dimensions behind the current investment view.
Growth
StrongCore ad demand, Reels monetization, and messaging tools still support healthy growth.
Profitability
StrongCore platform economics remain very strong despite heavy AI and Reality Labs investment.
Balance sheet
StrongNet cash and cash generation provide flexibility to sustain the current investment cycle.
Valuation
ModerateThe setup still offers upside, but quality and AI optionality are no longer inexpensive.
Execution / Resilience
ModerateExecution remains strong, though regulatory and platform-policy risk still matter.
Key drivers
Ad monetization remains supported by improving recommendation systems and Reels engagement.
Messaging and broader AI tools continue to expand monetization opportunities beyond the core feed.
Very strong cash generation supports a sustained AI capex cycle without stressing the balance sheet.
Key risks
AI and Reality Labs spending could stay elevated for longer than monetization supports.
Digital advertising demand remains sensitive to macro and regulatory shocks.
Policy or antitrust pressure could limit monetization flexibility across the platform set.
What would change our view
Faster ad conversion from AI products would improve conviction in the current upside case.
A more durable rise in Reality Labs losses without monetization progress would pressure the view.
Evidence of softer engagement monetization would likely reduce confidence in the base case.
Near-term catalysts
Ad pricing and engagement trends remain the nearest catalyst for estimate revisions.
Margin commentary around AI infrastructure and Reality Labs spend can move fair value quickly.
Updates on business messaging and AI agent monetization could improve sentiment on incremental upside.
What we are watching
Whether AI-driven ad efficiency gains remain durable as the investment cycle matures.
How quickly messaging and generative AI tools translate into meaningful revenue contributions.
Any change in regulatory posture that could affect platform economics or capital intensity.
Coverage metadata
How to read note event vs rating
Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.
Both were published Mar 20, 2026.
Report updated
Mar 20, 2026
Coverage status
Active coverage
Latest note event
Upgraded
Mar 20, 2026
Current published rating
Buy
Mar 20, 2026
Analyst note
Current work is focused on AI monetization durability, ad efficiency gains, and the payback period on infrastructure spend.
Model vs published view
Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.
Coverage timeline
Timeline events show published note events and the rating that followed each event. The current model signal is shown separately above.
Mar 20, 2026
Upgraded to Buy as ad efficiency gains and AI monetization improved the fair value range.
Jan 30, 2026
Maintained Hold while monetization improved but investment intensity stayed elevated.
Dec 16, 2025
Initiated with a Hold stance given strong core economics but elevated spend uncertainty.
Bull / Base / Bear scenarios
Bull case
$706
Normalized support: Growth, margin, and cash-flow trends are mixed versus the upside case.
Base case
$618
Normalized support: Current margin, cash-generation, and balance-sheet profile support the base case.
Bear case
$480
Downside protection: Cash generation and balance-sheet support remain supportive in the bear case.
Why this rating
The stock is currently being evaluated against $628 versus a base-case fair value of $618, implying -1.6 downside. That supports a Hold rating with Medium confidence under the current model.
Stale scheduled quote
$628
Fair value
$618
Upside / Downside
-1.6 downside
Model signal / Confidence
Hold / Medium
Confidence framing
Method agreement / dispersion
Valuation methods are tightly grouped, with implied values ranging from $590 to $631.
Margin strength
Operating margin is 41.7%, with +420 bps vs prior FY.
Balance sheet position
Balance sheet positioning remains net cash positive at $41.8B, with net cash positive.
Valuation methods
| Method | Implied Value | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| DCF (Base) | $631 | 50% |
| NTM P/E Multiple | $615 | 30% |
| EV/EBITDA Cross-check | $590 | 20% |
Buy / Hold / Sell output
Current model recommendation
Hold
Price: $628
Fair value: $618
Implied upside / downside: -1.6 downside
Current published rating: Buy on Mar 20, 2026
Model vs published view
Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.
The displayed rating is anchored to the base-case fair value. Buy is assigned at 8% or greater implied upside, Hold between -10% and +8%, and Sell at -10% or worse, with borderline calls cross-checked against normalized operating, cash-generation, and balance-sheet support. Confidence reflects valuation dispersion, operating margin profile, and balance-sheet strength.
What changed section
2026-03-20
Raised ad monetization assumptions after stronger Reels checks
Impact: +1.8% base case
2026-03-13
Lifted AI infrastructure spend in outer years
Impact: -0.7% DCF fair value
2026-03-06
Improved messaging monetization contribution
Impact: +0.6% EPS outlook