AnalystScope
AnalystScope equity researchCurrent company view

SNPS

Synopsys, Inc.

Information Technology / Electronic Design Automation / Sunnyvale, CA

View printable snapshot

AnalystScope signal

Buy

Scheduled quote

$389

Base fair value

$511

Bear / base / bull

$405 / $511 / $570

Upside / downside

+31.3 upside

Confidence

High

Research updated Jun 13, 2026

Daily scheduled refresh as of Aug 1, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC.

Informational research only. Not personalized investment advice.

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Live current-price moves may be widening the gap versus the latest published view.

Investment summary

Current view and thesis

Synopsys, Inc. is added as a high-quality large-cap coverage candidate with mission-critical EDA software and semiconductor IP with recurring demand characteristics. The initial AnalystScope view weighs chip complexity and AI-driven design activity against quality is well recognized in the multiple, limiting initial upside, keeping the rating restrained until the model has more live refresh history.

Fair value $511 vs. current $389 (+31.3 upside). Current base fair value is $511 versus $389, implying +31.3 upside.

Key drivers

01

Advanced-node and AI-chip complexity increases design-tool intensity.

02

Recurring software and IP demand supports high margin quality.

03

EDA market structure remains concentrated and strategically important.

Key risks

01

Semiconductor design-cycle softness could slow growth.

02

Transaction integration or regulatory friction could distract execution.

03

Premium multiple leaves limited room for lower design activity.

What would change the view

01

A clearer evidence base around chip complexity and ai-driven design activity would improve confidence.

02

A deterioration in high software gross margins and recurring design-tool demand support strong margins would reduce support for the current fair value.

03

A wider gap between price and normalized cash-flow support would make the rating harder to defend.

Valuation

Price, range, and method support

Base case $511 / +31.3 upside / high confidence

Price vs fair value

+31.4%

Model-implied return

Scheduled quote

$389

Fair value

$511

Valuation method stack

Weighted fair value $511

Published method weights

DCF (Base)

$520 | 45%

NTM P/E Multiple

$508 | 35%

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

$494 | 20%

Case / methodValueWeight / support
DCF (Base)$52045%
NTM P/E Multiple$50835%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$49420%
Bear case$405Supportive
Base case$511Supportive
Bull case$570Supportive

Fundamental analysis

Reported evidence and normalized model base

Normalized annual basis: FY2025

Download reported financials CSVDownload normalized financials CSV

Normalized figures are AnalystScope's annual valuation model base.

Normalized metricLatest valueGrowth / margin context
Revenue$6.8B+11.5% YoY
Operating income$1.9B27.9% margin
Net income$1.6BEPS proxy $10.38
Free cash flow$2.1B30.9% margin
EBITDA$2.2B32.4% margin
Net cash / (debt)$1.9B+27.9% of revenue
MetricReportedAnalystScope normalizedBasis note
Revenue (TTM)$7.1B$6.8BModel revenue smooths short-term demand, timing, and segment-mix volatility rather than treating the latest period as a straight-line run rate.
Operating Margin13.0%27.9%Margin input uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.
FCF (TTM)$1.3B$2.1BFCF input normalizes working-capital and capital-spending timing so cash conversion is not over-read from one period.
Net Cash / (Debt)($7.6B)$1.9BBalance-sheet input uses a conservative net cash / debt posture without assuming all cash is excess or fully distributable.

Fundamental snapshot

FY2025

Normalized annual model base

Revenue

+11.5% YoY

$6.8B

Op. margin

+1.7% pts

27.9%

FCF margin

-0.3% pts

30.9%

Revenue + margin trend

Annual normalized model-base history.

Revenue

2023
2024
2025

Operating margin

2023
2024
2025

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.

Income statement

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Revenue$5.8B$6.1B$6.8B
Gross Profit$4.6B$4.8B$5.4B
Operating Income$1.4B$1.6B$1.9B
EBITDA$1.6B$1.8B$2.2B
Net Income$1.2B$1.3B$1.6B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Cash & Investments$1.6B$1.9B$2.2B
Total Debt$100.0M$200.0M$300.0M
Net Cash / (Debt)$1.5B$1.7B$1.9B
Total Assets$12.0B$13.0B$14.5B
Total Liabilities$4.0B$4.2B$4.9B
Shareholders' Equity$8.0B$8.8B$9.6B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$1.8B$2.0B$2.2B
Depreciation & Amortization$200.0M$200.0M$300.0M
Capital Expenditures($100.0M)($100.0M)($100.0M)
Free Cash Flow$1.7B$1.9B$2.1B

Model assumptions

Base-case inputs and sensitivity

Published AnalystScope assumptions; private edits do not change this base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

10.0%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$14/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: Recurring software and IP demand supports high margin quality.

Terminal Growth

3.0%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$12/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 3.0%, it sits well below the 10.0% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Synopsys, Inc., that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

8.6%

+/- 0.5% => -$20/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Net cash supports strategic flexibility

Operating Margin (Year 5)

31.0%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$10/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It assumes some expansion from today's model-base operating margin (27.9%), with mix, scale, and operating leverage doing the work over time. Margin input uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.

Sensitivity drivers

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

10.0%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$14/sh

Terminal Growth

3.0%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$12/sh

WACC

8.6%

+/- 0.5% => -$20/sh

Operating Margin (Year 5)

31.0%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$10/sh

Confidence

High

Method outputs are tightly grouped at +5.1% dispersion.

Why the model view could be wrong

01

Semiconductor design-cycle softness could slow growth.

02

Transaction integration or regulatory friction could distract execution.

03

Premium multiple leaves limited room for lower design activity.

Private analysis

Test your own assumptions in Scenario Builder

Private scenarios remain separate from AnalystScope's published base case.

Open Scenario Builder

Private workspace

Scenario Builder

Private scenario sandbox

This is a private modelling layer, not the public AnalystScope base case or printable snapshot. It keeps the public base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates your scenario fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for SNPS. Base-case rationale remains in the public assumptions section above. Your scenario output reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust your scenario inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the public AnalystScope base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Public AnalystScope base case: 10.0% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$14/sh

Allowed range: 4.0% to 16.0%

Terminal Growth

Public AnalystScope base case: 3.0% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$12/sh

Allowed range: 1.5% to 4.5%

WACC

Public AnalystScope base case: 8.6% | +/- 0.5% => -$20/sh

Allowed range: 6.6% to 10.6%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Public AnalystScope base case: 31.0% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$10/sh

Allowed range: 23.0% to 39.0%

Saved private scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for SNPS. These are your scenarios: they never overwrite the public AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$511

Upside / Downside

+31.3 upside

Model signal

Buy

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$511

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

+31.3 upside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Buy

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$520$520$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$508$508$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$494$494$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$511$511-$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

10.0%3.0%8.6%31.0%

$511

+31.3 upside

Buy

Published anchor

Supporting research

Quality, normalization, and monitoring evidence

Annual model base: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025

Thesis scorecard

Growth

Moderate

chip complexity and AI-driven design activity

Profitability

Strong

high software gross margins and recurring design-tool demand support strong margins

Balance sheet

Moderate

net cash gives room for product investment and transaction integration

Valuation

Moderate

quality is well recognized in the multiple, limiting initial upside

Execution / Resilience

Moderate

large-customer semiconductor design cycles can still create demand timing volatility

Current source status

Quote: Daily scheduled refresh as of Aug 1, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC.

Reported fundamentals: Fundamentals refreshed 1 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC. Fresh through 2 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC.

Latest filing: 4 filed Jun 16, 2026 | Reporting period Jun 15, 2026. Filing refreshed Aug 1, 2026, 4:00 PM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 4:00 AM UTC.

Annual model-base income-statement, cash-flow, and balance-sheet metrics, plus cross-statement quality relationships with compact prior-FY direction cues, derived from the curated statement backbone.

Basis: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025. Live reported fundamentals remain available in the reconciliation section.

Operating and cash-flow trends

Model-base statements

Revenue growth (1Y)

+11.5%

Gross margin

79.4%

Operating margin

27.9%

Operating margin change vs prior FY

+1.7 pts

EBITDA margin

32.4%

EBITDA margin change vs prior FY

+2.8 pts

Operating income growth (1Y)

+18.8%

Net margin

23.5%

FCF margin

30.9%

FCF margin change vs prior FY

-0.3 pts

FCF growth (1Y)

+10.5%

Balance sheet quality

Model-base statements

Cash & investments

$2.2B

Total debt

$300.0M

Net cash / (debt)

Net cash $1.9B

Net cash / (debt) as % of revenue

Net cash 27.9% of revenue

Liabilities / assets

Stable

vs FY2024 (+1.5 pts)

33.8%

Cross-statement quality

Model-base statements

Gross-to-operating spread

51.5 pts

Operating cash flow / net income

Weakening

vs FY2024 (-0.2x)

1.4x

Operating cash flow / EBITDA

Weakening

vs FY2024 (-0.1x)

1.0x

Free cash flow / net income

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.1x)

1.3x

CapEx as % of revenue

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.2 pts)

1.5%

CapEx as % of operating cash flow

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.5 pts)

4.5%

CapEx / D&A

Improving

vs FY2024 (-0.2x)

0.3x

Cash & investments / total debt

Weakening

vs FY2024 (-2.2x)

7.3x

Shareholders' equity as % of revenue

141.2%

Asset turnover

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.0x)

0.5x

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Adjustment focus

Large analyst adjustment

Balance sheet | Net Cash / (Debt) | +$9.5B / +134% of revenue

Revenue momentum

Improving

+11.5% latest 1Y growth

vs +5.2% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Improving

27.9% latest margin

+171 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Stable

30.9% latest FCF margin

-27 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Stable

Net cash 27.9% of revenue

vs Net cash 27.9% of revenue prior FY

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

This initial coverage setup keeps valuation tied to durable normalized fundamentals and avoids letting a single recent print dominate the public view.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

Net Cash / (Debt)

$1.9B

FY2025 model base

($7.6B)

Live reported balance sheet

+$9.5B / +134% of revenueLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is less conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure because the latest reported balance does not appear fully representative. It balance-sheet input uses a conservative net cash / debt posture without assuming all cash is excess or fully distributable.

FCF (TTM)

$2.1B

FY2025 model base

$1.3B

Live reported TTM

+$800.0M / +62%Large analyst adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest cash-flow drag is fully durable. It normalizes working-capital and capital-spending timing so cash conversion is not over-read from one period.

Operating Margin

27.9%

FY2025 model base

13.0%

Live reported margin

+14.9 ptsLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest reported margin pressure is the durable earnings base. It uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.

Revenue (TTM)

$6.8B

FY2025 model base

$7.1B

Live reported TTM

-$300.0M / -4%Close to reportedModel base is lower than live reported because the thesis does not carry the current revenue run-rate straight into the durable operating base. It smooths short-term demand, timing, and segment-mix volatility rather than treating the latest period as a straight-line run rate.

Near-term catalysts

01

Next quarterly update and management commentary on demand quality.

02

Reported margin, cash-flow conversion, and balance-sheet movement versus the normalized model base.

03

Daily scheduled quote refreshes that tighten the current price-versus-fair-value read.

What we are watching

01

EDA backlog and design-start commentary.

02

IP growth and margin contribution.

03

Integration execution and any regulatory constraints.

DateEventPublished ratingNote
Jun 13, 2026NewHoldStarted coverage with a Hold view on exceptional EDA quality versus a full valuation.