AnalystScope

CSCO

Cisco Systems, Inc.

Cisco remains a quality cash compounder with a healthier software and services mix, but the valuation setup still looks more like a disciplined Hold than a wide-gap rerating case.

Live company workspace

This page is the active working surface. It combines the latest price context, filing status, reported fundamentals, refreshed model-base statements, current valuation output, and the scenario workbench. The report page stays separate as the published archival report.

Latest note event: New
Current published rating: Hold
Open published report

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Apr 9, 2026.

Current model signal

Sell

Confidence: High

Implied return: -23.6 downside

Fair value $87 vs. current $114 (-23.6 downside).

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Live investment view

Base case stance: Sell with high confidence as shares are currently being evaluated against an older daily scheduled quote of $114 versus $87 fair value, implying -23.6 downside. This workspace updates with the latest daily scheduled quote and reported inputs, while the published report remains a point-in-time note.

Price basis warning

Current price-dependent output is using a stale scheduled quote. Fair value, upside / downside, and the model signal are still shown, but they should be read with caution until a fresher daily scheduled quote refresh is available.

Current model signal

Sell

Latest note event

New

Published Apr 9, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Published Apr 9, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Daily scheduled refresh

Alpha Vantage GLOBAL_QUOTE

Latest daily scheduled quote is past the freshness window. Daily scheduled refresh as of May 21, 2026, 6:55 AM UTC. Fresh through May 22, 2026, 6:55 AM UTC.

Filing refreshed

144 filed Jun 4, 2026

Filing refreshed Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 PM UTC.

Open filing source

Fundamentals refreshed

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-07-26.

Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.

Current model signal

Sell

Confidence

High

Stale scheduled quote

$114

Fair value

$87

Upside / Downside

-23.6 downside

Top drivers

A larger software and services mix helps stabilize the revenue base relative to prior hardware-heavy cycles.

High cash conversion and a strong balance sheet support downside resilience.

Top risks

Enterprise spending hesitation could keep hardware demand softer for longer than the base case assumes.

Competitive pricing in networking and security could limit the margin benefit from a better mix.

Sector / Industry

Information Technology

Communications Equipment

Headquarters

San Jose, CA

Market Cap

$325B

Current / Fair Value

$114 / $87

Upside / Downside

-23.6 downside

Coverage snapshot

Report updated: Apr 10, 2026

Curated public preview analysis with live price, filing metadata, and reported fundamentals overlays. Full live filing ingestion is not yet enabled.

Coverage currently spans twenty-eight companies: MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, ORCL, AMD, NFLX, V, MA, WMT, PG, JNJ, ADBE, CSCO, TXN, COST, KO, HD, PEP, QCOM, INTU, MCD, ADP, ABT, and IBM.

Model-base financial summary

Current annual model-base range: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025

Revenue (Latest FY)

FY2025 | +3.3% vs prior FY

$55.6B

Operating Margin

+38 bps vs prior FY

27.5%

FCF (Latest FY)

27.2% margin | FY2025

$15.1B

Net Cash / (Debt)

Cash-rich networking balance sheet

$13.5B

Key ratios

EV / NTM EBITDA

Sector 14.8x

12.4x

P / NTM EPS

Sector 21.0x

16.2x

ROIC

Sector 12.7%

17.5%

Rule of 40

Healthy

31%

Base-case assumptions

These are AnalystScope's current base-case valuation inputs. The note under each number explains why that level is considered reasonable for this company; the sensitivity line shows how much fair value moves if that judgment is wrong.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

4.0%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$4/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: A larger software and services mix helps stabilize the revenue base relative to prior hardware-heavy cycles.

Terminal Growth

2.5%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 2.5%, it sits well below the 4.0% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Cisco Systems, Inc., that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

8.3%

+/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Cash-rich networking balance sheet

Operating Margin (Year 5)

28.5%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (27.5%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input avoids over-reading short-term product mix swings and restructuring timing.

How to read the assumptions and sensitivities

These are base-case assumptions used to estimate fair value. They are reasonable model inputs, not reported facts.

Each sensitivity line shows the estimated fair-value-per-share change from a small move in that one input while the other inputs stay fixed.

bps means basis points. 100 bps equals 1.00 percentage point.

WACC sensitivity moves in the opposite direction because a higher discount rate lowers present value, while a lower discount rate raises it.

Scenario workbench

Analyst workbench

This is a private working layer, not the published AnalystScope base case or report view. It keeps the published base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates the fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for CSCO. Base-case rationale remains in the assumptions section above. Scenario output now reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the published AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust the inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the published base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Published base case: 4.0% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$4/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 10.0%

Terminal Growth

Published base case: 2.5% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 1.0% to 4.0%

WACC

Published base case: 8.3% | +/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Allowed range: 6.3% to 10.3%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Published base case: 28.5% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 20.5% to 36.5%

Private saved scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for CSCO. They never overwrite the published AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$87

Upside / Downside

-23.6 downside

Model signal

Sell

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$87

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

-23.6 downside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Sell

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$90$90$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$86$86$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$84$84$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$87$87+$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

4.0%2.5%8.3%28.5%

$87

-23.6 downside

Sell

Published anchor

Model-base financial statements

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.

Income statement

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Revenue$57.0B$53.8B$55.6B
Gross Profit$36.1B$34.5B$36.0B
Operating Income$15.3B$14.6B$15.3B
EBITDA$17.3B$16.4B$17.2B
Net Income$11.1B$10.9B$11.6B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Cash & Investments$24.0B$25.0B$26.0B
Total Debt$11.5B$12.0B$12.5B
Net Cash / (Debt)$12.5B$13.0B$13.5B
Total Assets$101.0B$104.0B$108.0B
Total Liabilities$55.0B$56.0B$58.0B
Shareholders' Equity$46.0B$48.0B$50.0B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$16.2B$15.6B$16.3B
Depreciation & Amortization$2.0B$1.8B$1.9B
Capital Expenditures($1.1B)($1.1B)($1.2B)
Free Cash Flow$15.1B$14.5B$15.1B

Model base vs reported fundamentals

Side-by-side view of the latest live reported fundamentals versus the current AnalystScope model base used in public valuation and thesis work.

Reported numbers show the latest company print. Model base is the comparable operating base AnalystScope uses for valuation work, which can include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported figures do not look durable.

Reported fundamentals source

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-07-26.

Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.

Model-base impact on the thesis

For Cisco, the model base aims to capture durable infrastructure and software economics rather than quarter-specific hardware digestion noise.

Model-base diagnostics

Latest model base FY2025 versus the current live reported snapshot where available.

Income statement

Revenue

FY2025 $55.6B vs reported TTM $56.7B (-1.9%)

Operating margin

FY2025 27.5% vs reported 20.8% (+6.8 pts)

Cash flow

Free cash flow

FY2025 $15.1B vs reported TTM $13.3B (+13.6%)

FCF margin

FY2025 27.2% vs reported 23.5% (+3.7 pts)

Balance sheet

Net cash / (debt)

FY2025 Net cash $13.5B vs reported Net debt $15.8B

MetricLive reportedStatusModel baseStatus
Revenue (TTM)$56.7BLive reported$55.6B

+3.3% YoY

Adjustment: Model revenue smooths hardware digestion periods and keeps the base on steadier enterprise networking demand.

Model base
Operating Margin20.8%Live reported27.5%

+38 bps YoY

Adjustment: Margin input avoids over-reading short-term product mix swings and restructuring timing.

Model base
FCF (TTM)$13.3BLive reported$15.1B

27.2% margin

Adjustment: FCF input adjusts for working-capital timing while preserving Cisco's durable conversion advantage.

Model base
Net Cash / (Debt)($15.8B)Live reported$13.5B

Cash-rich networking balance sheet

Adjustment: Balance-sheet treatment reflects excess liquidity conservatively without assuming all cash is immediately distributable.

Model base

Reported vs durable model base

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

For Cisco, the model base aims to capture durable infrastructure and software economics rather than quarter-specific hardware digestion noise.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

Net Cash / (Debt)

$13.5B

FY2025 model base

($15.8B)

Live reported balance sheet

+$29.3B / +52% of revenueLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is less conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure because the latest reported balance does not appear fully representative. It reflects excess liquidity conservatively without assuming all cash is immediately distributable.

FCF (TTM)

$15.1B

FY2025 model base

$13.3B

Live reported TTM

+$1.8B / +14%Moderate adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest cash-flow drag is fully durable. It adjusts for working-capital timing while preserving Cisco's durable conversion advantage.

Operating Margin

27.5%

FY2025 model base

20.8%

Live reported margin

+6.7 ptsLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest reported margin pressure is the durable earnings base. It avoids over-reading short-term product mix swings and restructuring timing.

Revenue (TTM)

$55.6B

FY2025 model base

$56.7B

Live reported TTM

-$1.1B / -2%Close to reportedModel base is lower than live reported because the thesis does not carry the current revenue run-rate straight into the durable operating base. It smooths hardware digestion periods and keeps the base on steadier enterprise networking demand.

Financial diagnostics

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Adjustment focus

Large analyst adjustment

Balance sheet | Net Cash / (Debt) | +$29.3B / +52% of revenue

Revenue momentum

Improving

+3.3% latest 1Y growth

vs -5.6% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Stable

27.5% latest margin

+38 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Stable

27.2% latest FCF margin

+21 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Stable

Net cash 24.3% of revenue

vs Net cash 24.2% of revenue prior FY

Thesis scorecard

Qualitative scorecard of the main thesis dimensions behind the current investment view.

Growth

Moderate

Growth is steadier than fast, with software mix doing more work than hardware volume.

Profitability

Strong

Margins and free-cash-flow conversion remain solid for the category.

Balance sheet

Strong

Net cash gives Cisco more flexibility than many hardware peers.

Valuation

Moderate

The multiple is reasonable, but the fair-value spread is still fairly contained.

Execution / Resilience

Strong

Installed base and enterprise relationships support resilience.

Key drivers

A larger software and services mix helps stabilize the revenue base relative to prior hardware-heavy cycles.

High cash conversion and a strong balance sheet support downside resilience.

AI infrastructure and security attach can still provide selective incremental upside without changing the model philosophy.

Key risks

Enterprise spending hesitation could keep hardware demand softer for longer than the base case assumes.

Competitive pricing in networking and security could limit the margin benefit from a better mix.

If the software transition stalls, the current premium to slower-growth hardware peers could compress.

What would change our view

Broader evidence of sustained software and security acceleration would improve the setup.

A weaker enterprise hardware environment would make the current Hold harder to defend.

A wider discount to the current fair-value range would make the cash-yield story more attractive.

Near-term catalysts

Order trends and backlog normalization remain the cleanest near-term read-throughs.

Security and subscription commentary matter more than hardware units alone in the current setup.

Capital allocation updates can reinforce the downside floor if execution stays steady.

What we are watching

Whether software and services are doing enough to offset slower hardware replacement demand.

How resilient Cisco's margin base remains if enterprise budgets stay tighter.

Any sign that the current cash-rich balance sheet is becoming more aggressively deployed.

Coverage metadata

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Apr 9, 2026.

Report updated

Apr 9, 2026

Coverage status

Active coverage

Latest note event

New

Apr 9, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Apr 9, 2026

Analyst note

Watching software mix, enterprise hardware digestion, and whether AI/security demand can lift the current fair-value range.

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Coverage timeline

Timeline events show published note events and the rating that followed each event. The current model signal is shown separately above.

Apr 9, 2026

NewHold

Started coverage with a Hold view on solid cash generation and a narrower valuation spread.

Bull / Base / Bear scenarios

Bull case

$96

Normalized support: Growth, margin, and cash-flow trends are mixed versus the upside case.

Base case

$87

Normalized support: Current margin, cash-generation, and balance-sheet profile support the base case.

Bear case

$73

Downside protection: Cash generation and balance-sheet support remain supportive in the bear case.

Why this rating

The stock is currently being evaluated against $114 versus a base-case fair value of $87, implying -23.6 downside. That supports a Sell rating with High confidence under the current model.

Stale scheduled quote

$114

Fair value

$87

Upside / Downside

-23.6 downside

Model signal / Confidence

Sell / High

Confidence framing

Method agreement / dispersion

Valuation methods are tightly grouped, with implied values ranging from $84 to $90.

Margin strength

Operating margin is 27.5%, with +38 bps vs prior FY.

Balance sheet position

Balance sheet positioning remains net cash positive at $13.5B, with cash-rich networking balance sheet.

Valuation methods

MethodImplied ValueWeight
DCF (Base)$9045%
NTM P/E Multiple$8635%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$8420%

Buy / Hold / Sell output

Current model recommendation

Sell

Price: $114

Fair value: $87

Implied upside / downside: -23.6 downside

Current published rating: Hold on Apr 9, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

The displayed rating is anchored to the base-case fair value. Buy is assigned at 8% or greater implied upside, Hold between -10% and +8%, and Sell at -10% or worse, with borderline calls cross-checked against normalized operating, cash-generation, and balance-sheet support. Confidence reflects valuation dispersion, operating margin profile, and balance-sheet strength.

What changed section

2026-04-09

Added to AnalystScope coverage

Impact: New Hold view on steady infrastructure quality

2026-04-09

Kept hardware-cycle assumptions conservative

Impact: Avoids overstating upside from a single replacement wave