AnalystScope

PEP

PepsiCo, Inc.

PepsiCo remains a defensive cash compounder with broad category strength, but the current setup still reads as Hold rather than a wide-gap upside opportunity.

Live company workspace

This page is the active working surface. It combines the latest price context, filing status, reported fundamentals, refreshed model-base statements, current valuation output, and the scenario workbench. The report page stays separate as the published archival report.

Latest note event: New
Current published rating: Hold
Open published report

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Apr 10, 2026.

Current model signal

Buy

Confidence: Medium

Implied return: +11.1 upside

Fair value $166 vs. current $149 (+11.1 upside).

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Live investment view

Base case stance: Buy with medium confidence as shares are currently being evaluated against an older daily scheduled quote of $149 versus $166 fair value, implying +11.1 upside. This workspace updates with the latest daily scheduled quote and reported inputs, while the published report remains a point-in-time note.

Price basis warning

Current price-dependent output is using a stale scheduled quote. Fair value, upside / downside, and the model signal are still shown, but they should be read with caution until a fresher daily scheduled quote refresh is available.

Current model signal

Buy

Latest note event

New

Published Apr 10, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Published Apr 10, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Daily scheduled refresh

Alpha Vantage GLOBAL_QUOTE

Latest daily scheduled quote is past the freshness window. Daily scheduled refresh as of May 21, 2026, 6:54 AM UTC. Fresh through May 22, 2026, 6:54 AM UTC.

Filing refreshed

4 filed Jun 3, 2026 | Reporting period Jun 1, 2026

Filing refreshed Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 6, 2026, 6:27 PM UTC.

Open filing source

Fundamentals refreshed

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-12-27.

Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.

Current model signal

Buy

Confidence

Medium

Stale scheduled quote

$149

Fair value

$166

Upside / Downside

+11.1 upside

Top drivers

Snacks plus beverages provide a broader and steadier demand base than a single-category staple story.

Brand strength and distribution scale support a durable margin and cash-conversion profile.

Top risks

Consumer pushback on pricing or softer volume could pressure the base more than the current assumptions allow.

Commodity and FX swings can distort reported margins and sentiment around the durable base.

Sector / Industry

Consumer Staples

Beverages / Snacks

Headquarters

Purchase, NY

Market Cap

$213B

Current / Fair Value

$149 / $166

Upside / Downside

+11.1 upside

Coverage snapshot

Report updated: Apr 10, 2026

Curated public preview analysis with live price, filing metadata, and reported fundamentals overlays. Full live filing ingestion is not yet enabled.

Coverage currently spans twenty-eight companies: MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, ORCL, AMD, NFLX, V, MA, WMT, PG, JNJ, ADBE, CSCO, TXN, COST, KO, HD, PEP, QCOM, INTU, MCD, ADP, ABT, and IBM.

Model-base financial summary

Current annual model-base range: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025

Revenue (Latest FY)

FY2025 | +2.7% vs prior FY

$94.5B

Operating Margin

+5 bps vs prior FY

14.2%

FCF (Latest FY)

9.3% margin | FY2025

$8.8B

Net Cash / (Debt)

Leverage remains manageable but still constrains balance-sheet flexibility

($35.3B)

Key ratios

EV / NTM EBITDA

Sector 15.0x

16.9x

P / NTM EPS

Sector 19.6x

20.8x

ROIC

Sector 11.9%

16.1%

Rule of 40

Healthy

17%

Base-case assumptions

These are AnalystScope's current base-case valuation inputs. The note under each number explains why that level is considered reasonable for this company; the sensitivity line shows how much fair value moves if that judgment is wrong.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

4.5%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$4/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: Snacks plus beverages provide a broader and steadier demand base than a single-category staple story.

Terminal Growth

2.5%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 2.5%, it sits well below the 4.5% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For PepsiCo, Inc., that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

7.9%

+/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Leverage remains manageable but still constrains balance-sheet flexibility

Operating Margin (Year 5)

14.8%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$4/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (14.2%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input keeps the base on durable branded-snacks and beverage economics rather than temporary commodity or mix relief.

How to read the assumptions and sensitivities

These are base-case assumptions used to estimate fair value. They are reasonable model inputs, not reported facts.

Each sensitivity line shows the estimated fair-value-per-share change from a small move in that one input while the other inputs stay fixed.

bps means basis points. 100 bps equals 1.00 percentage point.

WACC sensitivity moves in the opposite direction because a higher discount rate lowers present value, while a lower discount rate raises it.

Scenario workbench

Analyst workbench

This is a private working layer, not the published AnalystScope base case or report view. It keeps the published base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates the fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for PEP. Base-case rationale remains in the assumptions section above. Scenario output now reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the published AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust the inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the published base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Published base case: 4.5% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$4/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 10.5%

Terminal Growth

Published base case: 2.5% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 1.0% to 4.0%

WACC

Published base case: 7.9% | +/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Allowed range: 6.0% to 9.9%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Published base case: 14.8% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$4/sh

Allowed range: 6.8% to 22.8%

Private saved scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for PEP. They never overwrite the published AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$166

Upside / Downside

+11.1 upside

Model signal

Buy

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$166

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

+11.1 upside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Buy

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$170$170$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$164$164$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$160$160$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$166$166-$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

4.5%2.5%7.9%14.8%

$166

+11.1 upside

Buy

Published anchor

Model-base financial statements

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.

Income statement

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Revenue$91.5B$92.0B$94.5B
Gross Profit$50.6B$50.4B$51.6B
Operating Income$13.2B$13.0B$13.4B
EBITDA$15.9B$15.8B$16.2B
Net Income$10.0B$9.8B$10.2B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Cash & Investments$8.8B$8.5B$8.7B
Total Debt$42.0B$43.5B$44.0B
Net Cash / (Debt)($33.2B)($35.0B)($35.3B)
Total Assets$97.0B$99.0B$101.0B
Total Liabilities$79.0B$80.5B$82.0B
Shareholders' Equity$18.0B$18.5B$19.0B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$13.5B$13.7B$14.2B
Depreciation & Amortization$2.7B$2.8B$2.8B
Capital Expenditures($5.0B)($5.2B)($5.4B)
Free Cash Flow$8.5B$8.5B$8.8B

Model base vs reported fundamentals

Side-by-side view of the latest live reported fundamentals versus the current AnalystScope model base used in public valuation and thesis work.

Reported numbers show the latest company print. Model base is the comparable operating base AnalystScope uses for valuation work, which can include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported figures do not look durable.

Reported fundamentals source

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2025-12-27.

Fundamentals refreshed 6 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC. Fresh through 6 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC.

Model-base impact on the thesis

For PepsiCo, the model base is designed to reflect durable branded-consumer economics rather than short-term FX, pricing, or category timing noise.

Model-base diagnostics

Latest model base FY2025 versus the current live reported snapshot where available.

Income statement

Revenue

FY2025 $94.5B vs reported TTM $93.9B (+0.6%)

Operating margin

FY2025 14.2% vs reported 12.2% (+1.9 pts)

Cash flow

Free cash flow

FY2025 $8.8B vs reported TTM $7.7B (+14.7%)

FCF margin

FY2025 9.3% vs reported 8.2% (+1.1 pts)

Balance sheet

Net cash / (debt)

FY2025 Net debt $35.3B vs reported Net debt $33.4B

MetricLive reportedStatusModel baseStatus
Revenue (TTM)$93.9BLive reported$94.5B

+2.7% YoY

Adjustment: Model revenue smooths geographic mix and pricing-volume timing instead of overreacting to a single quarter of consumer softness or FX noise.

Model base
Operating Margin12.2%Live reported14.2%

+5 bps YoY

Adjustment: Margin input keeps the base on durable branded-snacks and beverage economics rather than temporary commodity or mix relief.

Model base
FCF (TTM)$7.7BLive reported$8.8B

9.3% margin

Adjustment: FCF input adjusts for working-capital timing and keeps the cash-conversion base conservative.

Model base
Net Cash / (Debt)($33.4B)Live reported($35.3B)

Leverage remains manageable but still constrains balance-sheet flexibility

Adjustment: Balance-sheet treatment does not assume all cash is distributable and keeps leverage framing appropriately restrained.

Model base

Reported vs durable model base

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

For PepsiCo, the model base is designed to reflect durable branded-consumer economics rather than short-term FX, pricing, or category timing noise.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

FCF (TTM)

$8.8B

FY2025 model base

$7.7B

Live reported TTM

+$1.1B / +14%Moderate adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest cash-flow drag is fully durable. It adjusts for working-capital timing and keeps the cash-conversion base conservative.

Net Cash / (Debt)

($35.3B)

FY2025 model base

($33.4B)

Live reported balance sheet

-$1.9B / -2% of revenueClose to reportedModel base is more conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure. It does not assume all cash is distributable and keeps leverage framing appropriately restrained.

Operating Margin

14.2%

FY2025 model base

12.2%

Live reported margin

+2.0 ptsClose to reportedModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest reported margin pressure is the durable earnings base. It keeps the base on durable branded-snacks and beverage economics rather than temporary commodity or mix relief.

Revenue (TTM)

$94.5B

FY2025 model base

$93.9B

Live reported TTM

+$600.0M / +1%Close to reportedModel base is higher than live reported because the thesis does not assume the latest reported softness is the durable revenue run-rate. It smooths geographic mix and pricing-volume timing instead of overreacting to a single quarter of consumer softness or FX noise.

Financial diagnostics

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Adjustment focus

Moderate adjustment

Cash flow | FCF (TTM) | +$1.1B / +14%

Revenue momentum

Stable

+2.7% latest 1Y growth

vs +0.5% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Stable

14.2% latest margin

+5 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Stable

9.3% latest FCF margin

+7 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Stable

Net debt 37.4% of revenue

vs Net debt 38.0% of revenue prior FY

Thesis scorecard

Qualitative scorecard of the main thesis dimensions behind the current investment view.

Growth

Moderate

Growth is steady and category-driven, not unusually fast.

Profitability

Moderate

Margins are durable, though not immune to commodity and mix pressure.

Balance sheet

Weak

Leverage is manageable but still more restrictive than a net-cash staple peer.

Valuation

Moderate

The quality premium is deserved, but the valuation spread is still contained.

Execution / Resilience

Strong

Category breadth and brand strength support resilience.

Key drivers

Snacks plus beverages provide a broader and steadier demand base than a single-category staple story.

Brand strength and distribution scale support a durable margin and cash-conversion profile.

The current valuation still benefits from defensive appeal even without assuming unusually fast growth.

Key risks

Consumer pushback on pricing or softer volume could pressure the base more than the current assumptions allow.

Commodity and FX swings can distort reported margins and sentiment around the durable base.

Leverage leaves less room for disappointment than a stronger balance-sheet staple would.

What would change our view

A wider discount to fair value would make the defensive case more compelling.

Clearer volume-led improvement without margin erosion would support a more constructive view.

If pricing weakens while leverage remains elevated, confidence in the Hold case would fall.

Near-term catalysts

Pricing versus volume commentary remains the key near-term driver of sentiment.

Commodity and FX framing still shape confidence in the margin base.

Cash-conversion quality matters more than a single quarter of reported sales noise.

What we are watching

Whether the snacks and beverages mix stays supportive enough to offset any softer volume patches.

How durable current cash conversion is once working-capital timing normalizes.

Whether leverage remains comfortable if consumer conditions weaken further.

Coverage metadata

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Apr 10, 2026.

Report updated

Apr 10, 2026

Coverage status

Active coverage

Latest note event

New

Apr 10, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Apr 10, 2026

Analyst note

Watching pricing versus volume, cash-conversion durability, and whether leverage is staying comfortably inside the current base case.

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Coverage timeline

Timeline events show published note events and the rating that followed each event. The current model signal is shown separately above.

Apr 10, 2026

NewHold

Started coverage with a Hold view on durable category breadth and a still-contained spread to fair value.

Bull / Base / Bear scenarios

Bull case

$179

Normalized support: Growth, margin, and cash-flow trends are mixed versus the upside case.

Base case

$166

Normalized support: Current margin, cash-generation, and balance-sheet profile constrain the base case.

Bear case

$142

Downside protection: Cash generation and balance-sheet support are mixed in the bear case.

Why this rating

The stock is currently being evaluated against $149 versus a base-case fair value of $166, implying +11.1 upside. That supports a Buy rating with Medium confidence under the current model.

Stale scheduled quote

$149

Fair value

$166

Upside / Downside

+11.1 upside

Model signal / Confidence

Buy / Medium

Confidence framing

Method agreement / dispersion

Valuation methods are tightly grouped, with implied values ranging from $160 to $170.

Margin strength

Operating margin is 14.2%, with +5 bps vs prior FY.

Balance sheet position

Balance sheet positioning currently reflects net debt of ($35.3B), with leverage remains manageable but still constrains balance-sheet flexibility.

Valuation methods

MethodImplied ValueWeight
DCF (Base)$17045%
NTM P/E Multiple$16435%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$16020%

Buy / Hold / Sell output

Current model recommendation

Buy

Price: $149

Fair value: $166

Implied upside / downside: +11.1 upside

Current published rating: Hold on Apr 10, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

The displayed rating is anchored to the base-case fair value. Buy is assigned at 8% or greater implied upside, Hold between -10% and +8%, and Sell at -10% or worse, with borderline calls cross-checked against normalized operating, cash-generation, and balance-sheet support. Confidence reflects valuation dispersion, operating margin profile, and balance-sheet strength.

What changed section

2026-04-10

Added to AnalystScope coverage

Impact: New Hold view on defensive branded-consumer quality

2026-04-10

Kept balance-sheet treatment conservative

Impact: Avoids overstating distributable-cash support