AnalystScope
AnalystScope equity researchCurrent company view

SBUX

Starbucks Corporation

Consumer Discretionary / Restaurants / Seattle, WA

View printable snapshot

AnalystScope signal

Hold

Scheduled quote

$105

Base fair value

$108

Bear / base / bull

$88 / $108 / $122

Upside / downside

+2.4 upside

Confidence

Low

Research updated Jun 13, 2026

Daily scheduled refresh as of Aug 1, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC.

Informational research only. Not personalized investment advice.

Investment summary

Current view and thesis

Starbucks adds a high-search restaurant and consumer-brand name with useful comparison value against McDonald's and staples brands. The initial view is constructive but not aggressive.

Fair value $108 vs. current $105 (+2.4 upside). Current base fair value is $108 versus $105, implying +2.4 upside.

Key drivers

01

Traffic stabilization and frequency recovery are the most important operating drivers.

02

International unit growth remains a meaningful long-term support if local execution improves.

03

Margin recovery depends on labor productivity, menu mix, and reinvestment discipline.

Key risks

01

Traffic weakness could persist if value perception and service speed do not improve.

02

China and international execution may remain uneven through the recovery period.

03

Debt and capital-return posture reduce balance-sheet flexibility.

What would change the view

01

Sustained transaction growth would make the recovery case stronger.

02

A wider discount to fair value would improve the risk/reward balance.

03

Continued margin slippage despite traffic recovery would reduce confidence.

Valuation

Price, range, and method support

Base case $108 / +2.4 upside / low confidence

Price vs fair value

+2.6%

Model-implied return

Scheduled quote

$105

Fair value

$108

Valuation method stack

Weighted fair value $108

Published method weights

DCF (Base)

$110 | 45%

NTM P/E Multiple

$107 | 35%

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

$104 | 20%

Case / methodValueWeight / support
DCF (Base)$11045%
NTM P/E Multiple$10735%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$10420%
Bear case$88Mixed
Base case$108Mixed
Bull case$122Mixed

Fundamental analysis

Reported evidence and normalized model base

Normalized annual basis: FY2025

Download reported financials CSVDownload normalized financials CSV

Normalized figures are AnalystScope's annual valuation model base.

Normalized metricLatest valueGrowth / margin context
Revenue$38.1B+5.2% YoY
Operating income$5.8B15.2% margin
Net income$4.1BEPS proxy $3.62
Free cash flow$4.3B11.3% margin
EBITDA$7.4B19.4% margin
Net cash / (debt)-$21.2B-55.6% of revenue
MetricReportedAnalystScope normalizedBasis note
Revenue (TTM)$37.2B$38.1BModel revenue smooths traffic, ticket, and store-opening timing across the current turnaround period.
Operating Margin7.9%15.2%Margin input assumes measured recovery rather than immediate return to peak restaurant-level leverage.
FCF (TTM)$2.4B$4.3BFCF input normalizes store investment and working-capital timing while keeping reinvestment visible.
Net Cash / (Debt)($9.8B)($21.2B)Balance-sheet treatment keeps debt-funded capital returns explicit in the valuation support.

Fundamental snapshot

FY2025

Normalized annual model base

Revenue

+5.2% YoY

$38.1B

Op. margin

+0.3% pts

15.2%

FCF margin

+0.5% pts

11.3%

Revenue + margin trend

Annual normalized model-base history.

Revenue

2023
2024
2025

Operating margin

2023
2024
2025

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.

Income statement

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Revenue$36.0B$36.2B$38.1B
Gross Profit$9.7B$9.9B$10.6B
Operating Income$6.0B$5.4B$5.8B
EBITDA$7.4B$6.9B$7.4B
Net Income$4.2B$3.8B$4.1B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Cash & Investments$3.5B$3.8B$4.0B
Total Debt$24.0B$25.0B$25.2B
Net Cash / (Debt)($20.5B)($21.2B)($21.2B)
Total Assets$31.0B$32.0B$33.0B
Total Liabilities$30.0B$30.8B$31.5B
Shareholders' Equity$1.0B$1.2B$1.5B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$6.0B$6.1B$6.5B
Depreciation & Amortization$1.4B$1.5B$1.6B
Capital Expenditures($2.2B)($2.2B)($2.2B)
Free Cash Flow$3.8B$3.9B$4.3B

Model assumptions

Base-case inputs and sensitivity

Published AnalystScope assumptions; private edits do not change this base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

5.5%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: International unit growth remains a meaningful long-term support if local execution improves.

Terminal Growth

2.6%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 2.6%, it sits well below the 5.5% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Starbucks Corporation, that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

8.3%

+/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Debt-funded capital returns keep balance-sheet posture restrained

Operating Margin (Year 5)

16.2%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$4/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (15.2%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input assumes measured recovery rather than immediate return to peak restaurant-level leverage.

Sensitivity drivers

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

5.5%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$3/sh

Terminal Growth

2.6%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

WACC

8.3%

+/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Operating Margin (Year 5)

16.2%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$4/sh

Confidence

Low

Method outputs are tightly grouped at +5.6% dispersion.

Why the model view could be wrong

01

Traffic weakness could persist if value perception and service speed do not improve.

02

China and international execution may remain uneven through the recovery period.

03

Debt and capital-return posture reduce balance-sheet flexibility.

Private analysis

Test your own assumptions in Scenario Builder

Private scenarios remain separate from AnalystScope's published base case.

Open Scenario Builder

Private workspace

Scenario Builder

Private scenario sandbox

This is a private modelling layer, not the public AnalystScope base case or printable snapshot. It keeps the public base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates your scenario fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for SBUX. Base-case rationale remains in the public assumptions section above. Your scenario output reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust your scenario inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the public AnalystScope base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Public AnalystScope base case: 5.5% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 11.5%

Terminal Growth

Public AnalystScope base case: 2.6% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 1.1% to 4.1%

WACC

Public AnalystScope base case: 8.3% | +/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Allowed range: 6.3% to 10.3%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Public AnalystScope base case: 16.2% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$4/sh

Allowed range: 8.2% to 24.2%

Saved private scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for SBUX. These are your scenarios: they never overwrite the public AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$108

Upside / Downside

+2.4 upside

Model signal

Hold

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$108

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

+2.4 upside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Hold

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$110$110$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$107$107$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$104$104$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$108$108-$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

5.5%2.6%8.3%16.2%

$108

+2.4 upside

Hold

Published anchor

Supporting research

Quality, normalization, and monitoring evidence

Annual model base: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025

Thesis scorecard

Growth

Moderate

Store base and brand support growth, while traffic recovery still needs evidence.

Profitability

Moderate

Margins can recover, but labor, mix, and reinvestment keep the path uneven.

Balance sheet

Weak

Debt and capital returns constrain downside support.

Valuation

Moderate

The valuation does not leave a wide enough spread for a stronger initial rating.

Execution / Resilience

Moderate

Brand strength helps, but execution consistency is the key variable.

Current source status

Quote: Daily scheduled refresh as of Aug 1, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC.

Reported fundamentals: Fundamentals refreshed 1 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC. Fresh through 2 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC.

Latest filing: 10-Q filed Jul 29, 2026 | Reporting period Jun 28, 2026. Filing refreshed Aug 1, 2026, 4:26 PM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 4:26 AM UTC.

Annual model-base income-statement, cash-flow, and balance-sheet metrics, plus cross-statement quality relationships with compact prior-FY direction cues, derived from the curated statement backbone.

Basis: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025. Live reported fundamentals remain available in the reconciliation section.

Operating and cash-flow trends

Model-base statements

Revenue growth (1Y)

+5.2%

Gross margin

27.8%

Operating margin

15.2%

Operating margin change vs prior FY

+0.3 pts

EBITDA margin

19.4%

EBITDA margin change vs prior FY

+0.4 pts

Operating income growth (1Y)

+7.4%

Net margin

10.8%

FCF margin

11.3%

FCF margin change vs prior FY

+0.5 pts

FCF growth (1Y)

+10.3%

Balance sheet quality

Model-base statements

Cash & investments

$4.0B

Total debt

$25.2B

Net cash / (debt)

Net debt $21.2B

Net cash / (debt) as % of revenue

Net debt 55.6% of revenue

Liabilities / assets

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.8 pts)

95.5%

Cross-statement quality

Model-base statements

Gross-to-operating spread

12.6 pts

Operating cash flow / net income

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.0x)

1.6x

Operating cash flow / EBITDA

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.0x)

0.9x

Free cash flow / net income

Stable

vs FY2024 (+0.0x)

1.0x

CapEx as % of revenue

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.3 pts)

5.8%

CapEx as % of operating cash flow

Stable

vs FY2024 (-2.2 pts)

33.8%

CapEx / D&A

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.1x)

1.4x

Cash & investments / total debt

Stable

vs FY2024 (+0.0x)

0.2x

Shareholders' equity as % of revenue

3.9%

Asset turnover

Stable

vs FY2024 (+0.0x)

1.2x

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Adjustment focus

Large analyst adjustment

Cash flow | FCF (TTM) | +$1.9B / +79%

Revenue momentum

Improving

+5.2% latest 1Y growth

vs +0.6% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Stable

15.2% latest margin

+31 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Stable

11.3% latest FCF margin

+51 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Stable

Net debt 55.6% of revenue

vs Net debt 58.6% of revenue prior FY

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

Starbucks is treated as a mature global restaurant brand with recovery optionality, but the base case does not assume an instant traffic or margin reset.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

FCF (TTM)

$4.3B

FY2025 model base

$2.4B

Live reported TTM

+$1.9B / +79%Large analyst adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest cash-flow drag is fully durable. It normalizes store investment and working-capital timing while keeping reinvestment visible.

Net Cash / (Debt)

($21.2B)

FY2025 model base

($9.8B)

Live reported balance sheet

-$11.4B / -31% of revenueLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is more conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure. It keeps debt-funded capital returns explicit in the valuation support.

Operating Margin

15.2%

FY2025 model base

7.9%

Live reported margin

+7.3 ptsLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest reported margin pressure is the durable earnings base. It assumes measured recovery rather than immediate return to peak restaurant-level leverage.

Revenue (TTM)

$38.1B

FY2025 model base

$37.2B

Live reported TTM

+$900.0M / +2%Close to reportedModel base is higher than live reported because the thesis does not assume the latest reported softness is the durable revenue run-rate. It smooths traffic, ticket, and store-opening timing across the current turnaround period.

Near-term catalysts

01

Comparable-store sales and traffic commentary remain the primary near-term signals.

02

Labor productivity and service-speed updates can shift margin confidence.

03

International growth and China performance matter for the longer-run base case.

What we are watching

01

Whether the turnaround is showing up in transaction growth rather than only pricing.

02

How quickly margin improvement follows operational changes.

03

Whether international unit growth can offset mature-market pressure.

DateEventPublished ratingNote
Jun 13, 2026NewHoldStarted coverage with a Hold view on brand recovery potential versus still-unproven traffic and margin repair.