AnalystScope

TGT

Target Corporation (TGT)

Target Corporation is added as a high-quality large-cap coverage candidate with large-format retail with discretionary exposure, owned brands, and omnichannel fulfillment. The initial AnalystScope view weighs traffic stabilization, owned-brand mix, and margin recovery against consumer discretion and traffic uncertainty keep the initial view restrained, keeping the rating restrained until the model has more live refresh history.

Main company research view

Start here for AnalystScope's current fair value, model signal, thesis drivers, assumptions, normalized fundamentals, and private scenario sandbox. The printable report is secondary: a point-in-time published snapshot for archive or print use, not the primary research destination.

Latest note event: New
Current published rating: Hold
View printable snapshotCompare valuationMethodology

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Jun 13, 2026.

Current model signal

Sell

Confidence: Medium

Implied return: -22.2 downside

Fair value $105 vs. current $135 (-22.2 downside).

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Price vs fair value

-22.4%

Model-implied return

Stale scheduled quote

$135

Fair value

$105

Valuation method stack

Weighted fair value $105

Published method weights

DCF (Base)

$108 | 45%

NTM P/E Multiple

$104 | 35%

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

$101 | 20%

Current research conclusion

Base case stance: Sell with medium confidence as shares are currently being evaluated against an older daily scheduled quote of $135 versus $105 fair value, implying -22.2 downside. This workspace updates with the latest daily scheduled quote and reported inputs, while the printable report remains a point-in-time published snapshot.

Price basis warning

Current price-dependent output is using a stale scheduled quote. Fair value, upside / downside, and the model signal are still shown, but they should be read with caution until a fresher daily scheduled quote refresh is available.

Current model signal

Sell

Latest note event

New

Published Jun 13, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Published Jun 13, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Daily scheduled refresh

Alpha Vantage GLOBAL_QUOTE

Latest daily scheduled quote is past the freshness window. Daily scheduled refresh as of Jun 15, 2026, 11:45 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 16, 2026, 11:45 AM UTC.

Filing refreshed

144 filed Jun 16, 2026

Filing refreshed Jun 17, 2026, 3:56 AM UTC. Fresh through Jun 17, 2026, 3:56 PM UTC.

Open filing source

Fundamentals refreshed

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2026-01-31.

Fundamentals refreshed 17 Jun 2026, 04:00 UTC. Fresh through 17 Jun 2026, 16:00 UTC.

Current model signal

Sell

Confidence

Medium

Stale scheduled quote

$135

Fair value

$105

Upside / Downside

-22.2 downside

Top drivers

Owned brands and merchandising can support gross margin.

Omnichannel scale remains strategically relevant.

Top risks

Discretionary softness could pressure traffic and mix.

Shrink or markdowns can offset margin recovery.

Sector / Industry

Consumer Staples

Consumer Staples Merchandise Retail

Headquarters

Minneapolis, MN

Market Cap

$45B

Current / Fair Value

$135 / $105

Upside / Downside

-22.2 downside

Coverage snapshot

Report updated: Jun 15, 2026

Curated public preview analysis with live price, filing metadata, and reported fundamentals overlays. Full live filing ingestion is not yet enabled.

Coverage currently spans sixty-five companies: MSFT, NVDA, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO, ORCL, AMD, NFLX, V, MA, WMT, PG, JNJ, ADBE, CSCO, TXN, COST, KO, HD, PEP, QCOM, INTU, MCD, ADP, ABT, IBM, LOW, SBUX, NKE, DIS, AMAT, LRCX, MRK, PFE, TMO, ACN, NOW, PANW, SNPS, CDNS, ADI, HON, CAT, DE, UPS, BKNG, YUM, MDLZ, FDX, CMG, TGT, LULU, GILD, AMGN, REGN, ZTS, ISRG, SYK, DHR, CL, KMB, ROST, and TJX.

Fundamental snapshot

FY2026

Normalized annual model base

Revenue

+1.3% YoY

$108.0B

Op. margin

+0.2% pts

6.1%

FCF margin

+0.4% pts

3.4%

Revenue + margin trend

Annual normalized model-base history.

Revenue

2024
2025
2026

Operating margin

2024
2025
2026

Model-base financial summary

Current annual model-base range: FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026

Revenue (Latest FY)

FY2026 | +1.3% vs prior FY

$108.0B

Operating Margin

+20 bps vs prior FY

6.1%

FCF (Latest FY)

3.4% margin | FY2026

$3.7B

Net Cash / (Debt)

Leverage is manageable but consumer demand recovery matters

($13.8B)

Key ratios

EV / NTM EBITDA

Retail peer set

8.4x

P / NTM EPS

Retail peer set

14.0x

ROIC

Quality large-cap peer set

12.5%

Rule of 40

Business-model context

7%

Base-case assumptions

These are AnalystScope's current base-case valuation inputs. The note under each number explains why that level is considered reasonable for this company; the sensitivity line shows how much fair value moves if that judgment is wrong.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

2.5%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2026.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: Owned brands and merchandising can support gross margin.

Terminal Growth

2.0%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 2.0%, it sits well below the 2.5% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Target Corporation, that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

8.1%

+/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Leverage is manageable but consumer demand recovery matters

Operating Margin (Year 5)

6.5%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$6/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (6.1%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.

How to read the assumptions and sensitivities

These are base-case assumptions used to estimate fair value. They are reasonable model inputs, not reported facts.

Each sensitivity line shows the estimated fair-value-per-share change from a small move in that one input while the other inputs stay fixed.

bps means basis points. 100 bps equals 1.00 percentage point.

WACC sensitivity moves in the opposite direction because a higher discount rate lowers present value, while a lower discount rate raises it.

Scenario workbench

Private scenario sandbox

This is a private modelling layer, not the public AnalystScope base case or printable snapshot. It keeps the public base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates your scenario fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for TGT. Base-case rationale remains in the public assumptions section above. Your scenario output reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust your scenario inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the public AnalystScope base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Public AnalystScope base case: 2.5% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 8.5%

Terminal Growth

Public AnalystScope base case: 2.0% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$3/sh

Allowed range: 1.0% to 3.5%

WACC

Public AnalystScope base case: 8.1% | +/- 0.5% => -$5/sh

Allowed range: 6.1% to 10.1%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Public AnalystScope base case: 6.5% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$6/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 14.5%

Saved private scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for TGT. These are your scenarios: they never overwrite the public AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$105

Upside / Downside

-22.2 downside

Model signal

Sell

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$105

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

-22.2 downside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Sell

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$108$108$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$104$104$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$101$101$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$105$105+$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

2.5%2.0%8.1%6.5%

$105

-22.2 downside

Sell

Published anchor

Model-base financial statements

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026.

Income statement

Line itemFY2024FY2025FY2026
Revenue$107.4B$106.6B$108.0B
Gross Profit$29.0B$29.8B$30.5B
Operating Income$5.7B$6.3B$6.6B
EBITDA$8.4B$9.0B$9.3B
Net Income$3.7B$4.2B$4.3B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2024FY2025FY2026
Cash & Investments$3.8B$4.0B$4.2B
Total Debt$17.5B$17.8B$18.0B
Net Cash / (Debt)($13.7B)($13.8B)($13.8B)
Total Assets$55.0B$56.0B$57.0B
Total Liabilities$43.0B$43.5B$44.0B
Shareholders' Equity$12.0B$12.5B$13.0B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2024FY2025FY2026
Operating Cash Flow$7.3B$7.5B$7.8B
Depreciation & Amortization$2.7B$2.7B$2.7B
Capital Expenditures($4.5B)($4.3B)($4.1B)
Free Cash Flow$2.8B$3.2B$3.7B

Model base vs reported fundamentals

Side-by-side view of the latest live reported fundamentals versus the current AnalystScope model base used in public valuation and thesis work.

Reported numbers show the latest company print. Model base is the comparable operating base AnalystScope uses for valuation work, which can include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported figures do not look durable.

Reported fundamentals source

SEC XBRL companyfacts API

Live SEC companyfacts currently cover revenue, operating margin, free cash flow, and net cash / net debt. Reporting period end 2026-01-31.

Fundamentals refreshed 17 Jun 2026, 04:00 UTC. Fresh through 17 Jun 2026, 16:00 UTC.

Model-base impact on the thesis

This initial coverage setup keeps valuation tied to durable normalized fundamentals and avoids letting a single recent print dominate the public view.

Model-base diagnostics

Latest model base FY2026 versus the current live reported snapshot where available.

Income statement

Revenue

FY2026 $108.0B vs reported TTM $104.8B (+3.1%)

Operating margin

FY2026 6.1% vs reported 4.9% (+1.2 pts)

Cash flow

Free cash flow

FY2026 $3.7B vs reported TTM $2.8B (+30.5%)

FCF margin

FY2026 3.4% vs reported 2.7% (+0.7 pts)

Balance sheet

Net cash / (debt)

FY2026 Net debt $13.8B vs reported Net debt $12.3B

MetricLive reportedStatusModel baseStatus
Revenue (TTM)$104.8BLive reported$108.0B

+1.3% YoY

Adjustment: Model revenue smooths short-term demand, timing, and segment-mix volatility rather than treating the latest period as a straight-line run rate.

Model base
Operating Margin4.9%Live reported6.1%

+20 bps YoY

Adjustment: Margin input uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.

Model base
FCF (TTM)$2.8BLive reported$3.7B

3.4% margin

Adjustment: FCF input normalizes working-capital and capital-spending timing so cash conversion is not over-read from one period.

Model base
Net Cash / (Debt)($12.3B)Live reported($13.8B)

Leverage is manageable but consumer demand recovery matters

Adjustment: Balance-sheet input uses a conservative net cash / debt posture without assuming all cash is excess or fully distributable.

Model base

Reported vs durable model base

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

This initial coverage setup keeps valuation tied to durable normalized fundamentals and avoids letting a single recent print dominate the public view.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

FCF (TTM)

$3.7B

FY2026 model base

$2.8B

Live reported TTM

+$900.0M / +32%Large analyst adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest cash-flow drag is fully durable. It normalizes working-capital and capital-spending timing so cash conversion is not over-read from one period.

Revenue (TTM)

$108.0B

FY2026 model base

$104.8B

Live reported TTM

+$3.2B / +3%Close to reportedModel base is higher than live reported because the thesis does not assume the latest reported softness is the durable revenue run-rate. It smooths short-term demand, timing, and segment-mix volatility rather than treating the latest period as a straight-line run rate.

Net Cash / (Debt)

($13.8B)

FY2026 model base

($12.3B)

Live reported balance sheet

-$1.5B / -1% of revenueClose to reportedModel base is more conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure. It balance-sheet input uses a conservative net cash / debt posture without assuming all cash is excess or fully distributable.

Operating Margin

6.1%

FY2026 model base

4.9%

Live reported margin

+1.2 ptsClose to reportedModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest reported margin pressure is the durable earnings base. It uses a durable operating base and tempers one-off restructuring, mix, and cycle effects.

Financial diagnostics

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Adjustment focus

Large analyst adjustment

Cash flow | FCF (TTM) | +$900.0M / +32%

Revenue momentum

Stable

+1.3% latest 1Y growth

vs -0.7% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Stable

6.1% latest margin

+20 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Stable

3.4% latest FCF margin

+42 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Stable

Net debt 12.8% of revenue

vs Net debt 12.9% of revenue prior FY

Thesis scorecard

Qualitative scorecard of the main thesis dimensions behind the current investment view.

Growth

Moderate

traffic stabilization, owned-brand mix, and margin recovery

Profitability

Strong

gross margin repair and inventory discipline can support operating leverage

Balance sheet

Moderate

debt is manageable for a large retailer but limits aggressive upside framing

Valuation

Moderate

consumer discretion and traffic uncertainty keep the initial view restrained

Execution / Resilience

Moderate

category mix, shrink, and discretionary demand remain key risks

Key drivers

Owned brands and merchandising can support gross margin.

Omnichannel scale remains strategically relevant.

Inventory discipline can improve cash flow.

Key risks

Discretionary softness could pressure traffic and mix.

Shrink or markdowns can offset margin recovery.

Competition from Walmart, Amazon, and off-price retailers remains intense.

What would change our view

A clearer evidence base around traffic stabilization, owned-brand mix, and margin recovery would improve confidence.

A deterioration in gross margin repair and inventory discipline can support operating leverage would reduce support for the current fair value.

A wider gap between price and normalized cash-flow support would make the rating harder to defend.

Near-term catalysts

Next quarterly update and management commentary on demand quality.

Reported margin, cash-flow conversion, and balance-sheet movement versus the normalized model base.

Daily scheduled quote refreshes that tighten the current price-versus-fair-value read.

What we are watching

Comparable sales and traffic.

Gross margin and shrink commentary.

Inventory and free-cash-flow conversion.

Coverage metadata

How to read note event vs rating

Note event tells you what changed in the latest published note. Published rating shows the stance after that event.

Both were published Jun 13, 2026.

Report updated

Jun 13, 2026

Coverage status

Active coverage

Latest note event

New

Jun 13, 2026

Current published rating

Hold

Jun 13, 2026

Analyst note

New coverage entry focused on traffic stabilization, owned-brand mix, and margin recovery and consumer discretion and traffic uncertainty keep the initial view restrained.

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Coverage timeline

Timeline events show published note events and the rating that followed each event. The current model signal is shown separately above.

Jun 13, 2026

NewHold

Started coverage with a Hold view on recovery potential versus consumer and margin uncertainty.

Bull / Base / Bear scenarios

Bull case

$122

Normalized support: Growth, margin, and cash-flow trends are mixed versus the upside case.

Base case

$105

Normalized support: Current margin, cash-generation, and balance-sheet profile constrain the base case.

Bear case

$78

Downside protection: Cash generation and balance-sheet support are limited in the bear case.

Why this rating

The stock is currently being evaluated against $135 versus a base-case fair value of $105, implying -22.2 downside. That supports a Sell rating with Medium confidence under the current model.

Stale scheduled quote

$135

Fair value

$105

Upside / Downside

-22.2 downside

Model signal / Confidence

Sell / Medium

Confidence framing

Method agreement / dispersion

Valuation methods are tightly grouped, with implied values ranging from $101 to $108.

Margin strength

Operating margin is 6.1%, with +20 bps vs prior FY.

Balance sheet position

Balance sheet positioning currently reflects net debt of ($13.8B), with leverage is manageable but consumer demand recovery matters.

Valuation methods

MethodImplied ValueWeight
DCF (Base)$10845%
NTM P/E Multiple$10435%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$10120%

Buy / Hold / Sell output

Current model recommendation

Sell

Price: $135

Fair value: $105

Implied upside / downside: -22.2 downside

Current published rating: Hold on Jun 13, 2026

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

The displayed rating is anchored to the base-case fair value. Buy is assigned at 8% or greater implied upside, Hold between -10% and +8%, and Sell at -10% or worse, with borderline calls cross-checked against normalized operating, cash-generation, and balance-sheet support. Confidence reflects valuation dispersion, operating margin profile, and balance-sheet strength.

What changed section

2026-06-13

Added to AnalystScope coverage

Impact: Started coverage with a Hold view on recovery potential versus consumer and margin uncertainty.

2026-06-13

Initialized normalized annual model base

Impact: Adds a clean future TGT versus WMT comparison.