AnalystScope
AnalystScope equity researchCurrent company view

TMO

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Health Care / Life Sciences Tools & Services / Waltham, MA

View printable snapshot

AnalystScope signal

Sell

Scheduled quote

$574

Base fair value

$503

Bear / base / bull

$410 / $503 / $565

Upside / downside

-12.3 downside

Confidence

Medium

Research updated Jun 13, 2026

Daily scheduled refresh as of Aug 1, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC.

Informational research only. Not personalized investment advice.

Model vs published view

Current model signal differs from the latest published analyst rating.

Investment summary

Current view and thesis

Thermo Fisher adds a clean health-care tools name with strong disclosure and model fit. The first view is constructive but still below a high-conviction Buy threshold.

Fair value $503 vs. current $574 (-12.3 downside). Current base fair value is $503 versus $574, implying -12.3 downside.

Key drivers

01

Biopharma funding and instrument demand drive near-term revenue momentum.

02

Recurring consumables and services support cash-flow quality.

03

Integration discipline and operating leverage matter for margin recovery.

Key risks

01

Biopharma funding weakness could keep growth below the base case.

02

Acquisition-related leverage reduces downside flexibility.

03

Instrument demand can remain cyclical if customer budgets tighten.

What would change the view

01

Clearer demand recovery across biopharma customers would improve conviction.

02

Debt reduction and stronger free cash flow would strengthen downside support.

03

Further volume softness would keep the fair-value range restrained.

Valuation

Price, range, and method support

Base case $503 / -12.3 downside / medium confidence

Price vs fair value

-12.4%

Model-implied return

Scheduled quote

$574

Fair value

$503

Valuation method stack

Weighted fair value $503

Published method weights

DCF (Base)

$512 | 45%

NTM P/E Multiple

$500 | 35%

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

$490 | 20%

Case / methodValueWeight / support
DCF (Base)$51245%
NTM P/E Multiple$50035%
EV/EBITDA Cross-check$49020%
Bear case$410Mixed
Base case$503Mixed
Bull case$565Mixed

Fundamental analysis

Reported evidence and normalized model base

Normalized annual basis: FY2025

Download reported financials CSVDownload normalized financials CSV

Normalized figures are AnalystScope's annual valuation model base.

Normalized metricLatest valueGrowth / margin context
Revenue$43.8B+2.1% YoY
Operating income$9.6B21.9% margin
Net income$7.4BEPS proxy $19.30
Free cash flow$6.7B15.3% margin
EBITDA$12.7B29.0% margin
Net cash / (debt)-$30.1B-68.7% of revenue
MetricReportedAnalystScope normalizedBasis note
Revenue (TTM)$44.6B$43.8BModel revenue smooths biopharma funding cycles, instrument timing, and acquisition integration effects.
Operating Margin17.4%21.9%Margin input anchors to life-sciences-tools quality while allowing for volume and mix pressure.
FCF (TTM)$6.3B$6.7BFCF input normalizes working-capital and capex timing through life-sciences demand cycles.
Net Cash / (Debt)($14.7B)($30.1B)Balance-sheet treatment keeps acquisition-related leverage visible in downside support.

Fundamental snapshot

FY2025

Normalized annual model base

Revenue

+2.1% YoY

$43.8B

Op. margin

+0.9% pts

21.9%

FCF margin

+0.6% pts

15.3%

Revenue + margin trend

Annual normalized model-base history.

Revenue

2023
2024
2025

Operating margin

2023
2024
2025

AnalystScope annual model-base statements in USD across FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025.

Income statement

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Revenue$42.9B$42.9B$43.8B
Gross Profit$17.2B$17.4B$18.0B
Operating Income$8.6B$9.0B$9.6B
EBITDA$11.6B$12.0B$12.7B
Net Income$6.4B$6.9B$7.4B

Balance sheet

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Cash & Investments$7.5B$8.0B$8.4B
Total Debt$39.0B$38.8B$38.5B
Net Cash / (Debt)($31.5B)($30.8B)($30.1B)
Total Assets$98.0B$100.0B$102.0B
Total Liabilities$50.0B$50.0B$50.0B
Shareholders' Equity$48.0B$50.0B$52.0B

Cash flow

Line itemFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$7.5B$7.7B$8.1B
Depreciation & Amortization$3.0B$3.0B$3.1B
Capital Expenditures($1.4B)($1.4B)($1.4B)
Free Cash Flow$6.1B$6.3B$6.7B

Model assumptions

Base-case inputs and sensitivity

Published AnalystScope assumptions; private edits do not change this base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

4.5%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$11/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case growth assumption, not a guarantee. It sits below the latest FY model-base revenue pace (2025.0%), so the model does not extend current strength too far into the outer years. Current company context: Biopharma funding and instrument demand drive near-term revenue momentum.

Terminal Growth

2.5%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$9/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's mature long-run growth assumption, not a perpetual hypergrowth claim. At 2.5%, it sits well below the 4.5% five-year revenue CAGR, so the model steps down from the explicit forecast period to a steadier long-run pace. For Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., that means a durable franchise can keep compounding after year five without assuming today's faster growth profile lasts indefinitely.

WACC

8.2%

+/- 0.5% => -$15/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case cost-of-capital judgment, not a precise CAPM output. It reflects the current rates backdrop, equity risk premium, and the company's balance-sheet posture. Debt is manageable but still relevant after acquisition-led growth

Operating Margin (Year 5)

23.0%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$10/sh

Why this level: This is AnalystScope's base-case margin view, not a promise of straight-line expansion. It keeps year-five margins close to today's model-base operating margin (21.9%), which implies the current margin structure is broadly durable. Margin input anchors to life-sciences-tools quality while allowing for volume and mix pressure.

Sensitivity drivers

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

4.5%

+/- 1.0% => +/-$11/sh

Terminal Growth

2.5%

+/- 0.5% => +/-$9/sh

WACC

8.2%

+/- 0.5% => -$15/sh

Operating Margin (Year 5)

23.0%

+/- 100 bps => +/-$10/sh

Confidence

Medium

Method outputs are tightly grouped at +4.4% dispersion.

Why the model view could be wrong

01

Biopharma funding weakness could keep growth below the base case.

02

Acquisition-related leverage reduces downside flexibility.

03

Instrument demand can remain cyclical if customer budgets tighten.

Private analysis

Test your own assumptions in Scenario Builder

Private scenarios remain separate from AnalystScope's published base case.

Open Scenario Builder

Private workspace

Scenario Builder

Private scenario sandbox

This is a private modelling layer, not the public AnalystScope base case or printable snapshot. It keeps the public base case as the anchor, applies bounded changes to the four core valuation inputs, and updates your scenario fair-value estimate immediately.

Saved scenarios currently stay local to this browser for TMO. Base-case rationale remains in the public assumptions section above. Your scenario output reprices the published valuation methods from projected operating anchors when those anchors are available, while keeping market-multiple and capital-structure assumptions anchored to the AnalystScope framework.

Editable assumptions

Adjust your scenario inputs within the displayed plausible range for this company. The workbench stays anchored to the public AnalystScope base case.

This is a bounded scenario tool, not a free-form spreadsheet. Values outside the displayed range snap back to the nearest allowed value when you leave the field.

Matches the published AnalystScope base case.

Revenue CAGR (5Y)

Public AnalystScope base case: 4.5% | +/- 1.0% => +/-$11/sh

Allowed range: 0.0% to 10.5%

Terminal Growth

Public AnalystScope base case: 2.5% | +/- 0.5% => +/-$9/sh

Allowed range: 1.0% to 4.0%

WACC

Public AnalystScope base case: 8.2% | +/- 0.5% => -$15/sh

Allowed range: 6.2% to 10.2%

Operating Margin (Year 5)

Public AnalystScope base case: 23.0% | +/- 100 bps => +/-$10/sh

Allowed range: 15.0% to 31.0%

Saved private scenarios

Save up to 5 named scenarios for TMO. These are your scenarios: they never overwrite the public AnalystScope base case and remain clearly separate from public research.

Browser-local workspace0 / 5 saved

Checking private workspace session...

Private scenario note

Keep a short thesis, main risk, or why this case differs from the published base case.

0 / 280

Notes stay local to this browser unless you sign in to the private workspace, and they never appear as published AnalystScope research.

No private scenarios saved yet. Make a change to the published base case, then save a named scenario here.

Published base case

Fair value

$503

Upside / Downside

-12.3 downside

Model signal

Sell

Published base-case output

Scenario output reprices the published DCF and multiple methods from projected year-5 revenue, margin, free cash flow, EBITDA, and EPS anchors. Market multiples and capital structure stay anchored to the published base framework.

Fair value

$503

$0/sh vs published base case

Upside / Downside

-12.3 downside

+0.0 pts vs published base case

Model signal

Sell

Unchanged versus the published base case.

Method movement inside the scenario

This breakdown shows what moved inside the published valuation framework when you edit the scenario. The published AnalystScope base case stays anchored, and any method without a clean projected anchor remains pinned to that framework.

Method rows below reflect the current edited scenario state, not just the saved scenario snapshots.

Influence tags are directional rather than exact attribution. They estimate which edited input is moving each method most by reverting one assumption at a time while the other edited inputs stay in place.

3 of 3 methods support model-native repricingModel-native bridge
MethodPublished baseEdited scenarioDeltaHow it moved / main drivers

DCF (Base)

DCF-style | 45% weight

$512$512$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

NTM P/E Multiple

P/E-style | 35% weight

$500$500$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

EV/EBITDA Cross-check

EV-based multiple | 20% weight

$490$490$0/sh
Base-aligned

This method is supported by the model-native bridge and currently stays aligned with the published base case.

Edited inputs are largely offsetting each other, so this row stays close to the published base case.

Weighted fair value

Published framework result | Published framework result

$503$503+$0/sh
Moved

Combines the repriced method outputs using the published AnalystScope weights.

No single edited assumption is dominating this move in a material way.

Published base case vs private scenarios

Compare the published AnalystScope base case against your saved private scenarios in one view. Saved scenarios remain local to this browser, and the table below reflects saved snapshots rather than any unsaved edits currently sitting in the editor.

Fair-value comparisons use the same workbench recalculation path as the editor above.

Published base case stays pinned as the anchor row.

ScenarioRevenue CAGR (5Y)Terminal GrowthWACCOp. Margin (Y5)Fair ValueUpside / DownsideModel SignalDelta vs BaseAction

AnalystScope base case

Published

Official AnalystScope anchor row.

4.5%2.5%8.2%23.0%

$503

-12.3 downside

Sell

Published anchor

Supporting research

Quality, normalization, and monitoring evidence

Annual model base: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025

Thesis scorecard

Growth

Moderate

Long-run tools demand is attractive, while near-term biopharma demand remains uneven.

Profitability

Strong

Margins and cash conversion are solid for the current model.

Balance sheet

Moderate

Debt is manageable but still relevant.

Valuation

Moderate

The fair-value spread is positive but not wide enough for a stronger initial view.

Execution / Resilience

Strong

Scale, channel breadth, and recurring exposure support resilience.

Current source status

Quote: Daily scheduled refresh as of Aug 1, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 6:05 AM UTC.

Reported fundamentals: Fundamentals refreshed 1 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC. Fresh through 2 Aug 2026, 04:26 UTC.

Latest filing: 10-Q filed Jul 31, 2026 | Reporting period Jun 27, 2026. Filing refreshed Aug 1, 2026, 4:26 PM UTC. Fresh through Aug 2, 2026, 4:26 AM UTC.

Annual model-base income-statement, cash-flow, and balance-sheet metrics, plus cross-statement quality relationships with compact prior-FY direction cues, derived from the curated statement backbone.

Basis: FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025. Live reported fundamentals remain available in the reconciliation section.

Operating and cash-flow trends

Model-base statements

Revenue growth (1Y)

+2.1%

Gross margin

41.1%

Operating margin

21.9%

Operating margin change vs prior FY

+0.9 pts

EBITDA margin

29.0%

EBITDA margin change vs prior FY

+1.0 pts

Operating income growth (1Y)

+6.7%

Net margin

16.9%

FCF margin

15.3%

FCF margin change vs prior FY

+0.6 pts

FCF growth (1Y)

+6.3%

Balance sheet quality

Model-base statements

Cash & investments

$8.4B

Total debt

$38.5B

Net cash / (debt)

Net debt $30.1B

Net cash / (debt) as % of revenue

Net debt 68.7% of revenue

Liabilities / assets

Stable

vs FY2024 (-1.0 pts)

49.0%

Cross-statement quality

Model-base statements

Gross-to-operating spread

19.2 pts

Operating cash flow / net income

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.0x)

1.1x

Operating cash flow / EBITDA

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.0x)

0.6x

Free cash flow / net income

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.0x)

0.9x

CapEx as % of revenue

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.1 pts)

3.2%

CapEx as % of operating cash flow

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.9 pts)

17.3%

CapEx / D&A

Stable

vs FY2024 (-0.0x)

0.5x

Cash & investments / total debt

Stable

vs FY2024 (+0.0x)

0.2x

Shareholders' equity as % of revenue

118.7%

Asset turnover

Stable

vs FY2024 (+0.0x)

0.4x

Compact model-base diagnostics for analyst triage, highlighting where the durable valuation base is diverging most clearly from the latest reported picture.

Adjustment focus

Large analyst adjustment

Balance sheet | Net Cash / (Debt) | -$15.4B / -35% of revenue

Revenue momentum

Stable

+2.1% latest 1Y growth

vs +0.0% prior 1Y

Operating margin trend

Stable

21.9% latest margin

+94 bps vs prior FY

FCF margin trend

Stable

15.3% latest FCF margin

+61 bps vs prior FY

Balance-sheet posture

Strengthening

Net debt 68.7% of revenue

vs Net debt 71.8% of revenue prior FY

How to read this

Reported = the latest company-reported figure. Model base = AnalystScope's comparable operating base used for valuation and thesis work. It may include standardization, conservative balance-sheet treatment, working-capital cleanup, and through-cycle adjustments when current reported numbers do not look durable.

This is an analyst model base, not a claim of perfect adjusted truth. Larger gaps can reflect deliberate cyclical or base-case adjustments, not just light accounting cleanup.

Why the model base differs

Thermo Fisher is modeled as a high-quality life-sciences compounder with durable cash generation, but near-term demand softness and leverage keep the rating measured.

Rows are sorted by largest comparable adjustment first.

MetricModel baseLive reportedVariance vs reportedAdjustment sizeWhy lower / higher?

Net Cash / (Debt)

($30.1B)

FY2025 model base

($14.7B)

Live reported balance sheet

-$15.4B / -35% of revenueLarge analyst adjustmentModel base is more conservative than the live reported balance-sheet figure. It keeps acquisition-related leverage visible in downside support.

FCF (TTM)

$6.7B

FY2025 model base

$6.3B

Live reported TTM

+$400.0M / +6%Close to reportedModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest cash-flow drag is fully durable. It normalizes working-capital and capex timing through life-sciences demand cycles.

Operating Margin

21.9%

FY2025 model base

17.4%

Live reported margin

+4.5 ptsModerate adjustmentModel base is higher than live reported because the model does not assume the latest reported margin pressure is the durable earnings base. It anchors to life-sciences-tools quality while allowing for volume and mix pressure.

Revenue (TTM)

$43.8B

FY2025 model base

$44.6B

Live reported TTM

-$800.0M / -2%Close to reportedModel base is lower than live reported because the thesis does not carry the current revenue run-rate straight into the durable operating base. It smooths biopharma funding cycles, instrument timing, and acquisition integration effects.

Near-term catalysts

01

Biopharma demand commentary and order trends remain key.

02

Margin bridge and productivity updates can shift fair-value confidence.

03

Free-cash-flow conversion is an important balance-sheet monitor.

What we are watching

01

Whether customer demand is stabilizing across instruments and consumables.

02

How quickly margin recovery follows volume recovery.

03

Whether leverage trends lower without constraining investment.

DateEventPublished ratingNote
Jun 13, 2026NewHoldStarted coverage with a Hold view on high-quality life-sciences cash generation versus uneven near-term demand.